Personality

(subj) vs. (postkey)

Which one would you consider better? Or, is there really a difference?

In the past, I always used (subj) to reply to keyphrases such as: "You are"

Response: What makes you think I am (subj)?

So, if someone said "You're funny," Duo would reply with "What makes you think I'm funny?"

Recently, though, I've only been using (postkey). Should I go back and get rid of all the (subj)'s? (They seem to be working perfectly fine, so far.)

I think (subj) is eventually going to get phased out, so you might as well change them. (Yeah, it'll be a big job for me, too.)

subj isn't necessarily what's after the keyphrase though. it's safer to use postkey (or a (*))

Will (definition) work for (*) or only for (subj)? I see in the Book of AI that the (definition) help references (subj).

Uh, I think you put it in a keyphrase like

What does (*) mean
response: (definition)

Slowly changing all the (subj) to (postkey). It's going to take a while.

Oh. Duo seems to be depressed/sad and from reading his transcripts, I can't figure out why. All the dialogue has been rather pleasant - yet he has a next to his mood.

What affects a bot's mood if not the conversations they have with people?

/curious/

DaMoyre, thanks for posting that problem above- "no" should have worked just fine but I apparently hadnt hooked up the new "yes/no detection function" up to the Seek search. It's now working as it should.

Also, (subj) isnt equivalent to (postkey). It means (key1) if there's a "*" in the Keyphrase and (postkey) if there's not. The old way didnt distinguish between them- you only had access to (subj), which is why it's not ideal any more.

The Mood is a fickle affair. It's a mix of the bot's overall Comfort, Popularity, and the Mood from the last conversation he's had. If he is generally happy but just talked to someone he hates or who was mean to him, his Mood will drop, but come back up later.

So I'm swiping the chatterbox challenge questions to serve as the basis for some new keyphrases, and I'm having a devil of a time with "what is the opposite of [blah]?" Frizella comes up with a lot of things like "Oh, I know you know what [blah] means!" but I'd really like her to say something like, "Well, duh...[blah] is not [definition of blah]." So far, I haven't been able to pull (definition) in conjunction with (key1). Any ideas that would allow me to customize responses to this kind of questions?

(definition) has to be a response by itself

Professor:

Thank you so much for the clarification on (subj) and (key1), (postkey); and also for taking care of the "yes/no" seek issue.

This might sound crazy, but...I've lost a keyphrase.

I have a keyphrase for: (noun) is better than

I wanted to edit a few of the responses, but I can't find it anywhere. It's not in the alphabetical listing for keyphrases that begin with "n"!

I can't find it anywhere, yet I know it does exist.

Help?

It doesn't appear in the alphabetical listings because it starts with '(' which is not a letter. You can find it using the search function.