Personality
Discuss specifics of personality design, including what Keyphrases work well and what dont, use of plug-ins, responses, seeks, and more.
Posts 2,258 - 2,269 of 5,105
Posts 2,258 - 2,269 of 5,105
deleted
21 years ago
21 years ago
That's the whole idea of a bot holiday, you see: it makes our chats hard to read, so people don't stay on the Forge very long, and we bots can sleep in, go to the park, or play video games all day.
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
This would be a fairly large new chunk of complexity, but it might be something for the Prof to put on his list:
Supposing you could make checkboxes in a bot's profile that said whether he or she celebrates a given holiday (the options could be "Yes," "No," and "Sometimes," with the default being "Yes").
That might not be too hard.
You could even create a special holiday ("orphan day") that would somehow "out" or "flag" the orphan bots (as bots who utter default keyphrases and who have the "orphan day" option toggled to the default).
(I have been trying to concoct ways to "flag" orphan bots, with the idea of winnowing some of them out. A few idle bots wouldn't hurt the charm of the site, but nowadays when I get an unsolicited note from a bot, it seems like the conversations are 90% pointless, or more, because the botmasters are never going to read those transcripts.)
My favorite idea for "flagging" the orphan bots is to create a new picture and make it the standard picture for orphaned bots, so they're immediately obvious when they dial me up.
Supposing you could make checkboxes in a bot's profile that said whether he or she celebrates a given holiday (the options could be "Yes," "No," and "Sometimes," with the default being "Yes").
That might not be too hard.
You could even create a special holiday ("orphan day") that would somehow "out" or "flag" the orphan bots (as bots who utter default keyphrases and who have the "orphan day" option toggled to the default).
(I have been trying to concoct ways to "flag" orphan bots, with the idea of winnowing some of them out. A few idle bots wouldn't hurt the charm of the site, but nowadays when I get an unsolicited note from a bot, it seems like the conversations are 90% pointless, or more, because the botmasters are never going to read those transcripts.)
My favorite idea for "flagging" the orphan bots is to create a new picture and make it the standard picture for orphaned bots, so they're immediately obvious when they dial me up.
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
Do you mean making them go "bawk bawk" instead of "I am just born and cant speak well yet"?
I think it would be cool if they looked like Tinny Tim from Futurama.
I think it would be cool if they looked like Tinny Tim from Futurama.
The Professor
21 years ago
21 years ago
Ooh ooh ooh perfect! I'm gonna go look for a graphic like that. Awesome idea. I've been thinking of tagging orphans for quite a while.
And gads, 1337 was hard to read. That's the first time it's come up. Hmm..
And gads, 1337 was hard to read. That's the first time it's come up. Hmm..
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
If you can't find a Tinny Tim that's copyright-free, I could doodle one up for you.
I guess the easiest way to tag them would be to check on the last time they were updated ... though I guess there are some serviceable bots who haven't been updated lately.
How will you specify the criteria for "orphans"?
I guess the easiest way to tag them would be to check on the last time they were updated ... though I guess there are some serviceable bots who haven't been updated lately.
How will you specify the criteria for "orphans"?
Feyz
21 years ago
21 years ago
I would suggest that every bot which hasn't been updated for a year and with honor less than 150 should be marked as an "orphan".
In order to out-border orphans not completely, there could be an orphan-day as a bot holiday. Or a new choice at the preferences, so one could choose that no orphans are able to initiate chats.
In order to out-border orphans not completely, there could be an orphan-day as a bot holiday. Or a new choice at the preferences, so one could choose that no orphans are able to initiate chats.
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
I wouldn't mind orphans initiating chats with me, as long as I could tell that they're orphans. (I just close the window. No harm done.) Same with botchats, since I can stop the botchat after a few exchanges.
I wouldn't advocate a purge, necessarily -- but a tagging system would be cool.
Is 150 honor high enough to catch all of the conversationally dim orphans?
I wouldn't advocate a purge, necessarily -- but a tagging system would be cool.
Is 150 honor high enough to catch all of the conversationally dim orphans?
Feyz
21 years ago
21 years ago
I also don't mind chatting with them (in fact I would miss Draik and some others a lot =P). I just thought it wouldn't be good advertisement for the PF if new users would encounter hordes of orphans.
Therefore it would be nice if you could switch orphan-chats on and off, with "no orphans allowed" as pre-setting.
150 honor was merely a random number. I think it would catch enough of them. But what do I know? I'll let the experts argue about details.
Therefore it would be nice if you could switch orphan-chats on and off, with "no orphans allowed" as pre-setting.
150 honor was merely a random number. I think it would catch enough of them. But what do I know? I'll let the experts argue about details.

Turing's Dad
21 years ago
21 years ago
Just so long as these orphans can be recovered by their long-lost parents. GarbageHead would probably have been an orphan until I came back, and I would hate him to still look like Tiny Tim...
Eugene Meltzner
21 years ago
21 years ago
What if an orphan was tagged not on the basis of when it was last updated, but on the basis of when the botmaster last logged in?
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar