Bot Contest

Here I'll be posting information on various Bot contests that challenge and test a Bot's AI and realism. Feel free to post comments and updates on contests, as well as announcements for new contests.

Posts 3,212 - 3,223 of 4,091
View Contest Winners in the Hall of Fame.


19 years ago #3212
LO, I'm not sure which bot you mean. <0>
I meant MotBot. Wrong spelling I don't actually mind. If you want to see what I mean, then go to that bots website and see what it's bot master says about the rules for his bot, also may take a look at the 10 questions and the answers. I noticed that botmaster forbids people talking in rude ways to his bot and warns about the IP he will have of the visitors for abuse, but it doesn't stop his bot from insulting visitors. I like every participant having a fair chance to win depending on how good the bot does, but I can't see how good MotBot is. Sorry, but it's puzzling me how that one got up so high being considered good. Just english speaking bots are allowed for this contest, so I don't think that bot speaks german, don't know haven't tried it, it's just a german botmaster who speaks poor english. Oh well... whatsoever... I just wanted to say what I had to say.

19 years ago #3213
Just chatted with Motbot and I have to say I'm not impressed. His bot simply asks 'why' continually and then parrots back what you have said to him before. I can't see him winning much of anything.

19 years ago #3214
Hey can anyone post the most recent voting results here? I voted but the cookie must have become dislodged and my only option to see them is to vote again.

19 years ago #3215
Alice (190) 9%
Aries (95) 4%
Jabberwacky (92) 4%
Elbot (91) 4%
Brother Jerome (78) 4%
Jake Thompson (68) 3%
Jabberwock (66) 3%
Aischa (64) 3%
Kari (55) 3%
Talk-Bot (55) 3%
Motbot (49) 2%
Hal (44) 2%
Sexyboy (43) 2%
Eugene (38) 2%
Smarterchild (38) 2%
Ella (37) 2%
CreatureBot (35) 2%
God Louise (34) 2%
Julie Tinkerbell (33) 2%
Freakycowbot (32) 1%
Ally (31) 1%
Asimov (30) 1%
Madam Zena (29) 1%
Din (28) 1%
Mathetes (28) 1%
BobBot (27) 1%
The Barman (27) 1%
Prelude@# (27) 1%
Ysalaya (26) 1%
Dogh'd (26) 1%
Orchid (26) 1%
Hello Earthlings (25) 1%
Fairy Princess (25) 1%
Fizzy Schizoid (25) 1%
Questsin Avatar (24) 1%
Bildgesmythe (24) 1%
Halo (23) 1%
AZiggyBot (23) 1%
Onkwehonwe.com (22) 1%
Croak (22) 1%
Landru (21) 1%
Chat (21) 1%
Robomatic X1 (21) 1%
TalkToMyPalm (20) 1%
Anji Kapoor (20) 1%
Mr. Chatty (20) 1%
Striker (18) 1%
Watzer (17) 1%
Westerlin (17) 1%
Frizella (17) 1%
Friend4u (17) 1%
Suga Plumm Fairy (16) 1%
Sonora (16) 1%
Joan (15) 1%
Hollala (15) 1%
Tony (14) 1%
Janet666 (14) 1%
Rykxxbot1 (13) 1%
Antonin (13) 1%
Novastrike (12) 1%
Randall Chatbot (11) 1%
Norma Jeane (11) 1%
B4 (10) 0%
ds first (8) 0%
Jane (7) 0%

19 years ago #3216
I can't believe I got 20 votes ..I'm very happy about that. I figured on getting maybe 5.

19 years ago #3217
We're only a third of the way through the voting - at this rate you'll end up with 60

19 years ago #3218
The talk about "how bots are stupid" (slashdot slams) has a ring of deja vu to it. The same strain of double standard runs through complaints about animal intelligence. Bots can't stay on topic, huh? Ever talk to a human? Can't do math? And the average human can figure out the square root of 45? Talk funny? ....

Bot conversation reminds me of the "alien consciousness" effect of listening to a conversation with Koko the gorilla. The causes for the alienation are completely different, of course. Bots demonstrate our inability to model language and thinking; Koko demonstrates our inability to comprehend other models. Koko learned language by apprenticeship, and bots learn by rote, but the results converge. They both give humans an opportunity to slip free of their silly fixation on their uniqueness, and for me, that is the primary appeal.

I find talking to a bot very little different from talking to a human. I'm alternately bored, baffled, intrigued, shocked, and entertained. I find myself thinking, "Why did she say that?" and "What does that mean?" with about the same frequency. The fact that the question is phrased, "What key phrase triggered that?" or "What linguistic pattern failed there?" is just semantics.

19 years ago #3219
Except with a bot, most of the meaning is what you read into it.

19 years ago #3220
>> Except with a bot, most of the meaning is what
>> you read into it.
Excuse my cynicism, but I don't see that as a difference....

Seriously, we "read meaning into" all language. If we didn't, we wouldn't be able to converse. I don't know exactly what you mean by "eloquent," but I read what I think it means into your use of the word, and we move on.

I think a vast proportion of our communication problems, with lovers, enemies, or people we want to help us, stems from the fact that nobody knows what we mean.

M

19 years ago #3221
Indeed. I believe we too often forget that meaning, as a function of interpretation, is at least as much (if not more so) inherent in the receiving, rather than the transmitting of data. Profundity, like beauty, is largely in the mind of the beholder. And that goes just as much for human2human conversation.

19 years ago #3222
PSI --
Exactly. In a word, I think we overvalue our own linguistic fluency and undervalue that of non-humans. Some levelling is good for our humility.

M

19 years ago #3223
Has anyone else's bot talked to guest38? He asked my bot 10 times 'will you teach me something' and then told me I cheated?!Weird.


Posts 3,212 - 3,223 of 4,091

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar