Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 3,157 - 3,168 of 8,681
Posts 3,157 - 3,168 of 8,681
Skysaw
21 years ago
21 years ago
I second that, Hemi, as well as xcommand. Or at least, it would be nice to be able to set the priority on those, the same as any other keyphrase.
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
Joe, I think that error might have to do with names that are in more than two parts: I get it sometimes in a botchat when Simulo is talking to a bot that has a first and a last name.
msim11
21 years ago
21 years ago
punctuation is not allowed in seeks... what about if the bot asks what browser version and the user tpyes in IE5.5?
The Professor
21 years ago
21 years ago
I'm trying to figure out what causes the SQL error. If any of you guys see it, please let me know what was said immediately before it happened and who the bot was replying.
Thanks.
Thanks.
The Professor
21 years ago
21 years ago
BUG FIXES:
Turing: You can get the text of any command with (command)
Turing: "What's 22 time 3" fails because it has "time" instead of "times". The other xmath bug I fixed.
Everyone: I did a massive plug-in fix a few weeks ago.
Taryn: The angry face is now working!
Everyone: I stomped a bug that was setting certain transcript dates in an endless loop
Ruebot: Direct chat links are working for everyone again.
Turing: You can get the text of any command with (command)
Turing: "What's 22 time 3" fails because it has "time" instead of "times". The other xmath bug I fixed.
Everyone: I did a massive plug-in fix a few weeks ago.
Taryn: The angry face is now working!

Everyone: I stomped a bug that was setting certain transcript dates in an endless loop
Ruebot: Direct chat links are working for everyone again.
isaacc
21 years ago
21 years ago
The SQL error seems to happen when a bot picks up a name with more than one word in it, from something the other bot (or person) said, and tries to repeat it back. I think. I'll keep an eye open and see if I can make a more accurate description.
Turing's Dad
21 years ago
21 years ago
Hmmm, so after doing a pretty good job of confusing a human, GH finally broke down and gave himself away:
DA: moo.
GH: Okay.
DA: Squeak.
GH: Okay.
DA: Mooski for the brewski
GH: Okay.
DA: Mooski for the brewski
GH: Okay.
I think that these were all being interprested as commands, and I guess 'Okay.' is the default response to that.
Is every verb placed by itself interpreted as a command? The xCommand seems really broad, and I agree with Skysaw that it would be nice to give it a ranking. Also, how did 'Mooski for the brewski' get interpreted as a command..?
DA: moo.
GH: Okay.
DA: Squeak.
GH: Okay.
DA: Mooski for the brewski
GH: Okay.
DA: Mooski for the brewski
GH: Okay.
I think that these were all being interprested as commands, and I guess 'Okay.' is the default response to that.
Is every verb placed by itself interpreted as a command? The xCommand seems really broad, and I agree with Skysaw that it would be nice to give it a ranking. Also, how did 'Mooski for the brewski' get interpreted as a command..?
sollunessen
21 years ago
21 years ago
not sure if this is a bug or not...
i set up some pseudo-keywords that could be used as 'goto's from various other responses, and should not ever be used in normal conversation. the two main ones are 'lamexcuse' and 'wmsurreal'. sometimes they get used as i intended, but sometimes the bot just says 'goto wmsurreal' without actually *going to* the pseudo-keyword. any thoughts?
i set up some pseudo-keywords that could be used as 'goto's from various other responses, and should not ever be used in normal conversation. the two main ones are 'lamexcuse' and 'wmsurreal'. sometimes they get used as i intended, but sometimes the bot just says 'goto wmsurreal' without actually *going to* the pseudo-keyword. any thoughts?
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar