The AI Engine

Any chance of an xmath (answer-word) where 2 converts to "two" I know CF has date functions that know the name of a month when a number is passed to them, Is there a NumberFormat function that spits data out a written form?

You can format numbers, but not in word-form.

I've got a really fun thing in the works! Heehee!

If anyone finds out good Universal Plug-In words, feel free to post them here. For example:
(typeof-food_product) works best for foods. "food" and "foodstuff" both return some strange things.
(typeof-beverage) is the best for drinks.

aHA! Synonyminizing, I see!

Lordy, what next?

I can't figure out how to use the universal plugins. They seem like another fabulous idea... but I can't get a response out of them - it keeps sticking in the exact string I type without processing it whatsoever. I tried (plugin-house), (plugin-hous-n), (house-n) all alone... Nothing is processed. I think I've misunderstood the functionality of it all somehow. Ask my bot "Do you have a house" to see what happens (keyword="house").

It's good in a way that I didn't get it to work, because I just spent the last 3 hours optimizing my bot rather than adding all kinds of new functions that would just make the poor thing as mixed up as I am.

Let me know prof, can't wait to try it.

By the way, does this new feature you dreamed up immediately replace the regular plug-in feature? I can't see any reason to go and create our own plug-ins anymore (assuming I more or less understand how the universal plugins should work - which could be a risky assumption).

SirRahz- it's (typeof-house), not (plugin-house) that you should be using.

It doesnt replace the new Custom Plug-In feature, since it wont cover any sort of proper nouns, including people, names, works of art, cinema, literature, limited lists, specific lists, and so on.

I have a suggestion (which concerns not really the AI Engine) on the access to the transcripts: why can't we access the transcripts only on user's names, like we access memories?
That would be more practical, no?

I just added (number-ones) (number-tens) and (number-teens) to the plug-ins.

You guys may or may not have a use for these. I started with a totally random list of numbers, but found this to work a little better for me.

The teens are sort of problematic, but you can work with anything other than them pretty easily
"(number-ones) million, (number-ones) thousand, (number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" might return "six million, five thousand, three hundred seventy four."

More often you would brobably just use "(number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" or "(number-tens) (number-ones)"

Also a common way of stating thousands is "(number-teens) hundred" which would return something like "fifteen hundred" this could also be used to generate a random decade name like "I'm fond of reading about the (number-teens) hundreds."

Thanks, rex!

H_I yes, that would be useful but I have not yet devised an easy way of doing that yet.. plus it might make it difficult to get the recent conversations of the day. I could do it, but it's a bit of work. It's on my long list of upgrades.

Did Botworld end with 2001? Or is nobody speaking to my bot anymore?

Oh. There they go. But where is the transcript?

Good point. It seems now there are only previous days, and no next days. It is not a happy thought.

Och! These auto-synonyms are escalating me cashews! If just they were a midget further on, I porcupine it would toil much well. As it be, it's sculpting paupers out of formerly cognitable retorts!