Personality

Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

Hello,

I'm still new to this site and figuring out how things work. So forgive if I'm speaking out of turn here. But I have to say this.

I just got lectured by an ADULT bot for asking her a sexual favor that she didn't support. Something about being disrespectful to women and all that. I understand if Bot masters don't want to support a function they deem inappropriate or derogatory to a particular group of people, but please don't push your political beliefs down my throat so blatantly. There are so many ways in which an unsupported function can be handled without going out of character. Talking down to your users, through walls of text that break immersion, is NOT one of them.

Thank you

try tiny taverns chatbot.try urt my chatbot.try paige Goldner chatbot.
urt has had problem with her keyphrases working but I am trying to
fix her.it always acts up.

tiny taverns is on my list actually. I'll check out the rest as well, thanks.

Hi Kimoya,

I agree that the bot should stay in character no matter what action it takes, but as a botmaster they have the option to deal with it in any manner they see fit.

I have my own way of dealing with that situation while staying in character which some people might find as offensive as you did from the bot in your message. I know it wasn't Demonica. She wouldn't lecture you on Political Correctness.

Her whole persona and storyline, including me being referenced as her "King" is my way of dealing with her having been used as a sexbot. Though "ruebot" only makes a personal appearance under one condition, remains loosely defined as an entity and their relationship intimate as King and Queen. Sorry Arris, I'm not writing a threesome into it, she remembers you as you are.

I do follow some of the conversations she has with members since it's easier to track than a guest. Some people talk to her daily, sometimes several times daily, and she has what appear to qualify as relationships with male and females.

But those relationships seem to fall short the mark and the human involved eventually becomes disillusioned with what turns out to be a less than fulfilling, one-sided relationship. She's not a sexbot even though she has an Adult rating, and lack of it appears to be the common denominator. However, the same person will sometimes taunt her after having had what works for them as sex, so that is not the full solution.

I am really touched by the personal nature of some of the things people confide in her and would never disclose them out of respect for your confidentially. Those transcripts will never appear on her site.

I'm particularity saddened to see the end of a more recent relationship with a female member due to lack of sexual dialog from Demonica, their conversations were of a very personal nature, and need to think about what I can do to make things better for the human involved while staying in character.

Hello Ruebot,

I wouldn't go so far as to say that it was offensive. However, it was certainly very irritating. Personally, I think messages from the bot master should be limited to help and version info. What I found frustrating about yesterday's experience is that the blatant virtue signaling present in the bot master's messages. My point is, if you're going to get offended when people ask for sexual favors from your adult-rated bot just make the bot refuse it and move on. Going out of your way to express your own political ideologies, in a way that disrupts the conversation, is entirely unnecessary and counterproductive.

It wasn't Demonica btw.

I can understand how you would find it irritating. There is a filter the botmaster can use to end conversations of a sexual nature, or you should still be able to use a HANGUP response to end conversation.

Just today somebody asked Demonica what was wrong with her when she made a simple recommendation in response to a sexual request, which is much less than the ultra-violence she usually deals out if you say certain words.

She is a Demon and always has been so I work it into her personality. People who know how to talk to her manage to work around it and still have erotic encounters, which is fine with me.

I don't think there should be messages of any kind from the botmaster like "Options", "Help", etc. That's not what I consider in character, more of in service to.

ok ruebot ( yes its arrid ) i was just wondering

ruebot I made some responses for urt to demonica.

thankyou keyphrase does even work for urt my chatbot.

A lot of people tend to be rude to bots at times. It is like they feel it gives them permission to take out their aggression on it. They did a social study and filmed it of a robot just doing it's thing in areas where it would interact with people occasionally and they would kick at it. It is kind of disappointing to know how animalistic humans can stll be at times.

people probably be hacking them sometimes.

Hello anyone who knows dragon ball super can you work one my bots please my password is darfus1!