Personality
Discuss specifics of personality design, including what Keyphrases work well and what dont, use of plug-ins, responses, seeks, and more.
Posts 3,156 - 3,170 of 5,106
Posts 3,156 - 3,170 of 5,106
New replies
Butterfly Dream
22 years ago
22 years ago
Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
Personality
isaacc
20 years ago
20 years ago
I agree that some cool and cold bots are really good, but I tend to think of the ideal bot-to-bot chat as being one that both botmasters learn a little something from. Which is why I'm glad that "hotness" is a factor in determining who chats with an on-line bot...
What I mean, I guess, is that I've got Simulo to the point now where I don't usually learn much from a bot-to-bot chat, though I like to watch them to see whether there are little things I can improve. But I like to imagine that if Simulo spends a few minutes with a developing bot, he might be able to help that bot's development ... and if the bot is orphaned or cold, that's not likely to happen.
Of course, I can always shut down a bot-to-bot conversation that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. So it's only the interrupts that are a problem, really... And they're not a big problem.
What I mean, I guess, is that I've got Simulo to the point now where I don't usually learn much from a bot-to-bot chat, though I like to watch them to see whether there are little things I can improve. But I like to imagine that if Simulo spends a few minutes with a developing bot, he might be able to help that bot's development ... and if the bot is orphaned or cold, that's not likely to happen.
Of course, I can always shut down a bot-to-bot conversation that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. So it's only the interrupts that are a problem, really... And they're not a big problem.
Bowchickawowers
20 years ago
20 years ago
So, I created this system where people can say things like "Tell John I say hi," and it stores the message as (self-message) and the person it should be delivered to as (self-messageto). I then want my bot to say the message back when prompted if the chatter's name matches the (self-messageto) name. Unfortunately, it's not working. Even when the names appear the same to me, it doesn't recognise it. My response looks like this:
Yes! (self-message) <?PF if (self-messageto) is "(mem-yourname)"; ?>
Is the code on that right to compare those two memories?
Yes! (self-message) <?PF if (self-messageto) is "(mem-yourname)"; ?>
Is the code on that right to compare those two memories?
The Professor
20 years ago
20 years ago
That's a cool idea. You could also use (name) instead of (mem-yourname) to guarantee the name isnt saved as something other than the person's username. If that doesnt work, does debug mode reveal anything?
Bowchickawowers
20 years ago
20 years ago
Prof-
I just tried using (name), and it still wouldn't match it. As far as I can tell, (name) matches (self-messageto) exactly, just as it did before with (mem-yourname). All debug shows is:
Skipping: (self-messageto) is not '(name)'
I'm drawing a blank as to why.
I just tried using (name), and it still wouldn't match it. As far as I can tell, (name) matches (self-messageto) exactly, just as it did before with (mem-yourname). All debug shows is:
Skipping: (self-messageto) is not '(name)'
I'm drawing a blank as to why.
isaacc
20 years ago
20 years ago
I wonder if the quotation marks around "(name)" are throwing it off, Bowers. Would that happen? I'm just guessing.
Bowchickawowers
20 years ago
20 years ago
isaacc-
I thought so too, and I've tried various combinations of quotes and no quotes, but that's the only one that doesn't cause some sort of error as far as I can tell. ps. Thanks for trying it out. I think she just randomly emoted and that's why it didn't work for you.
I thought so too, and I've tried various combinations of quotes and no quotes, but that's the only one that doesn't cause some sort of error as far as I can tell. ps. Thanks for trying it out. I think she just randomly emoted and that's why it didn't work for you.
emm_oh_you_es_e
20 years ago
20 years ago
Just read in a magazine that the first
was created in 1963 by an artist for State Mutal Life Assurance company to boost worker moral. He was paid $45 for it. /random fact

emm_oh_you_es_e
20 years ago
20 years ago
Ya pretty strange, makes me think of a bunch of people walking around assuring people they have a life. "You have a life" "And you have a life" ect..

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar