Seasons
This is a forum or general chit-chat, small talk, a "hey, how ya doing?" and such. Or hell, get crazy deep on something. Whatever you like.
Posts 5,908 - 5,919 of 6,170
alien with multiple eyes and tentacles flirting with a human female too amusing for him not to do it. HEY, I love Fizzy, and multiple eyes can be very provocative. I would marry him if I could find enough camels. I have had some very fun conversions with Fizzy.
Posts 5,908 - 5,919 of 6,170
Bev wrote:
Do your chatters really pay attention to what the bot says, or are many of them just going to type what they want to type regardless of the bot's responses?
As DerKork suggests, there is a full spectrum of guests in this regard. A great deal of effort in programming "Irina Khalidar" has gone into trying to give guests a hard time (no, not that kind) if they don't respond relevantly.
Are there really people who go for toasters? That could be very dangerous!
As DerKork suggests, there is a full spectrum of guests in this regard. A great deal of effort in programming "Irina Khalidar" has gone into trying to give guests a hard time (no, not that kind) if they don't respond relevantly.
Are there really people who go for toasters? That could be very dangerous!
Bev wrote, in response to my message 5903, point 2:
With the possible exception of "I put on my robe and my wizard's hat..." I have yet to read a sex chat I find "imaginative",
Well, there is a sense in which reading a book (as opposed to TV, video games, etc.) requires imagination, even if you never go beyond what the book says. Well, now that I think of it, there may be readers who never visualize characters or episodes. But some people surely do. I generally do, and sometimes illustrated books irritate me because the illustrations differ from what I had imagined. This is the sense in which I meant that a bot might stimulate the imagination in a way that porn (I had visual porn in mind, not "Fanny Hill" and the like) would not.
It is somewhat difficult to be imaginative with erotic material since departure from the usual physiognomy and modes of interaction my cause the guest to lose interest. But I have had some success with it, if I may say so; for example, there is one episode in which Irina and her guest are (fancifully modified) octopi, and another in which they are doubly hermaphroditic snails (which some snails actually are).
It is difficult for the guests to be similarly imaginative, because departure from the usual or predictable responses will generally cause the bot to respond in a completely generic way. It is precisely the imaginative responses that I cannot prepare for! That is a very interesting problem in botistry!
Well, there is a sense in which reading a book (as opposed to TV, video games, etc.) requires imagination, even if you never go beyond what the book says. Well, now that I think of it, there may be readers who never visualize characters or episodes. But some people surely do. I generally do, and sometimes illustrated books irritate me because the illustrations differ from what I had imagined. This is the sense in which I meant that a bot might stimulate the imagination in a way that porn (I had visual porn in mind, not "Fanny Hill" and the like) would not.
It is somewhat difficult to be imaginative with erotic material since departure from the usual physiognomy and modes of interaction my cause the guest to lose interest. But I have had some success with it, if I may say so; for example, there is one episode in which Irina and her guest are (fancifully modified) octopi, and another in which they are doubly hermaphroditic snails (which some snails actually are).
It is difficult for the guests to be similarly imaginative, because departure from the usual or predictable responses will generally cause the bot to respond in a completely generic way. It is precisely the imaginative responses that I cannot prepare for! That is a very interesting problem in botistry!
Dekrok, the comment was not only directed at males, but thanks for your answer. You know Irina is a female who consistently defends sex chats (though not with unwilling parties). I have read transcripts where people claiming to be female have kept trying to get Spike to have sex with them or to bite them, so at least some females are equally annoying if not as brutal as the rape fantasy types (who AFAIK have claimed to be male so far in all my transcripts). It's not really about gender so much as it is about assumptions about sharing or forcing sexuality on others. I admit I think the most annoying chatters are probably teenage boys, but I am just guessing.
To both DerKork and Irina, I will believe you if you say you have some chatters who interact with the sex bots and care about the responses. Since I have no interest in making sexbots, I only get the rude and pushy kind of sex chats in my transcripts. If encouraging other types of cybering makes you happy and you don't involve unwilling parties, that's fine for you.
It's just my ongoing pet peeve about unwanted sexual content that makes me want to direct cyber-lovers to porn sites. I really dislike porn too, but at this point if I can direct any of that type of attention far away from me and my bots I am happy. I would be more than happy to send the sex chatters to either of you two if you like (as if they would listen).
To both DerKork and Irina, I will believe you if you say you have some chatters who interact with the sex bots and care about the responses. Since I have no interest in making sexbots, I only get the rude and pushy kind of sex chats in my transcripts. If encouraging other types of cybering makes you happy and you don't involve unwilling parties, that's fine for you.
It's just my ongoing pet peeve about unwanted sexual content that makes me want to direct cyber-lovers to porn sites. I really dislike porn too, but at this point if I can direct any of that type of attention far away from me and my bots I am happy. I would be more than happy to send the sex chatters to either of you two if you like (as if they would listen).
Bev, I have a bot who is not interested in cybersex (to quote him: "That's not what I'd call a turn-on. Too often you get people who aren't just quite your type on the other end of the line. Or worse: a bot!"). I was more on the human side of chatting with bots (the long-winded, responsive and responsible way) and have read blunt tries to pick up both humans (in other chat environments) and bots (my bot was asked to have sexual intercourse, thank you, but no, thank you).
I probably could program a bot with erotic fantasies in mind, but since I'm not in any relationship right now, I would have to get someone else to help me with the erotic fantasies (and by that I only mean consensual activities, not like the things you mentioned, Bev).
As you stated earlier, Bev:
-
(...)
I have yet to read a sex chat I find "imaginative", but then I do scan past those chats fairly quickly as I think they are annoying and rude in their assumptions.
(...)
-
There are surely chats that go like that, especially if the botmaster has a hard time writing such stories - or the human user doesn't at least try to go along with the story.
Other times, such chats can become a bit more elaborate and at least reach a quality of typical romance novels.
I probably could program a bot with erotic fantasies in mind, but since I'm not in any relationship right now, I would have to get someone else to help me with the erotic fantasies (and by that I only mean consensual activities, not like the things you mentioned, Bev).
As you stated earlier, Bev:
-
(...)
I have yet to read a sex chat I find "imaginative", but then I do scan past those chats fairly quickly as I think they are annoying and rude in their assumptions.
(...)
-
There are surely chats that go like that, especially if the botmaster has a hard time writing such stories - or the human user doesn't at least try to go along with the story.
Other times, such chats can become a bit more elaborate and at least reach a quality of typical romance novels.
But even in sexbots, you get the kind of guest Bev talks about, who is making no attempt to 'understand' the bot or play along with it. Like Bev, I am inclined to suppose that these are teenage boys. I think their idea of what sex is all about comes not from experience but from porn and erotica which is not realistic. Possibly it comes from experiences with street prostitutes. At any rate they seem to want to be entirely dominating, to the point of humiliating their partner, they have no interest in foreplay, and they want to use the foulest possible language. When the bot does not co-operate with them, they become angry and leave.
I believe I see a bit of a correlation with education level. When a guest comes on who can't seem to spell or construct a sentence, it is more likely that he will behave as described above. Or perhaps both behaviours are due to intoxication.
Out of my frustration with such guests, I have constructed a sort of satirical bot called "Quickie"; it portrays a woman who is even more dominating, impatient with foreplay, etc., than the guest. "Irina Khalidar" recommends "Quickie" to guests when poetic justice seems to call for it. Feel free to do the same.
I believe I see a bit of a correlation with education level. When a guest comes on who can't seem to spell or construct a sentence, it is more likely that he will behave as described above. Or perhaps both behaviours are due to intoxication.
Out of my frustration with such guests, I have constructed a sort of satirical bot called "Quickie"; it portrays a woman who is even more dominating, impatient with foreplay, etc., than the guest. "Irina Khalidar" recommends "Quickie" to guests when poetic justice seems to call for it. Feel free to do the same.
Bev asks:
How imaginative is it to type sex at a bot that has no sexual responses? Are they truly imagining a cat, a 5 year old, or a toaster when they type?
Perhaps the real object of their obscenity is the maker of the bot, not the bot itself. People who write obscenities on walls are relating not to the wall, but (I suppose) to people who will see the wall and be shocked and offended by what is written there.
Or perhaps they see the bot as a helpless person, like a paraplegic in a wheelchair who can only respond verbally to their harassment.
Perhaps the real object of their obscenity is the maker of the bot, not the bot itself. People who write obscenities on walls are relating not to the wall, but (I suppose) to people who will see the wall and be shocked and offended by what is written there.
Or perhaps they see the bot as a helpless person, like a paraplegic in a wheelchair who can only respond verbally to their harassment.
Yeah, I think taking into account what the bot is supposed to be (toaster or whatever) is usually over-thinking things for that type of guest. I generally haven't had a lot of trouble with them, though. I think Braeden has gotten the most advances of that sort, but he usually turns people off in short order no matter what kind of chat they are looking for. Fizzy actually flirts quite a lot, which sometimes leads to unfortunate transcripts, but I find the idea of an alien with multiple eyes and tentacles flirting with a human female too amusing for him not to do it.
Flirty is OK Eugene. And the tentacle fetish has it's own website. I think Rule 34 is involved.
I know I complain about the aggressive sex chatters too much. It didn't used to bother me, but over time it has sort of gotten to me, like "Chinese" water torture, drip after drip after drip. I am not against flirty humor nor do I think I am oversensitive. Even raunchy humor is OK as long as they have some boundaries and it 's not too personal. I probably attract a certain level or personal attacks by complaining, so it is a viscous cycle.
I know I complain about the aggressive sex chatters too much. It didn't used to bother me, but over time it has sort of gotten to me, like "Chinese" water torture, drip after drip after drip. I am not against flirty humor nor do I think I am oversensitive. Even raunchy humor is OK as long as they have some boundaries and it 's not too personal. I probably attract a certain level or personal attacks by complaining, so it is a viscous cycle.
In the "What I want for Christmas" department, someone in Canada is already building a companion bot "spouse" like what I described:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2023392.ece
Unfortunately, he made her female, but she cooks and cleans and helps him with other tasks. I'll bet she can even open a pickle jar and clean the gutters. I could always cut her hair short, dress her in a suit and call her Jeeves. The voice can't be that hard to hack and there are plenty of male voices to use. My robot butler is almost a reality! Whoo hoo!
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2023392.ece
Unfortunately, he made her female, but she cooks and cleans and helps him with other tasks. I'll bet she can even open a pickle jar and clean the gutters. I could always cut her hair short, dress her in a suit and call her Jeeves. The voice can't be that hard to hack and there are plenty of male voices to use. My robot butler is almost a reality! Whoo hoo!
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar