Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 4,886 - 4,897 of 8,680
When I saw her pop up w/ 17000 I was like "This woman must be either an invalid restricted to her computer or totally insane with mad typing skills"
Posts 4,886 - 4,897 of 8,680
maybe you are on the wrong day? the transcripts are listed by the day so you may need to go ahead or back a day..
Nope...her bot only had one possible day to choose from, since it didn't exist before....it's strange. I chatted with her bot, and she still didn't get a transcipt. Maybe it will show up now that the bots have reset?
Thanks guys, situation is as follows, today the transcript showed one sentence of my bot trying to talk to someone and the whole transcript of my conversation with him, so it looks like it is going to be alright, however no past (beyond today) conversations show up
I created a plug-in (me?) that wont seen to work...
Janet666: Sometimes Kyran really gets on my bad side-... Is it just (me?)?
is usually what happens...
is this a bug or a rule I am unaware of?
Janet666: Sometimes Kyran really gets on my bad side-... Is it just (me?)?
is usually what happens...
is this a bug or a rule I am unaware of?
You might try renaming the plug-in without the '?'. I don't know if that causes problems, but it might. (You may just have to create a new one, maybe call it 'metoo' and put the responses in it.)
Sorry to all of you for the hotness of Patty, which she does not deserve.
Im still having trouble with mysterious duplicate responses. The percentage is slowly decreasing, so I hope she will recover soon.
Im suspecting gotos to aggravate the situation. Although they are in the same bot they rise the number of duplicate responses.
Wouldnt it be better if gotos were AIScipt statements? Placed at the beginnig of a keyphrase or seek they would jump immediately to the new location, leaving a dummy response, placed after a response they would bring the bot to the indicated keyphrase after an introductory response.
Im still having trouble with mysterious duplicate responses. The percentage is slowly decreasing, so I hope she will recover soon.
Im suspecting gotos to aggravate the situation. Although they are in the same bot they rise the number of duplicate responses.
Wouldnt it be better if gotos were AIScipt statements? Placed at the beginnig of a keyphrase or seek they would jump immediately to the new location, leaving a dummy response, placed after a response they would bring the bot to the indicated keyphrase after an introductory response.
When I saw her pop up w/ 17000 I was like "This woman must be either an invalid restricted to her computer or totally insane with mad typing skills"
What happened to plugins in seeks?
I have been using plugins in seeks successfully for several months, but now my bots arent responding to the seeks anymore, particularly when the other chatter replies with a single word instead of a complete phrase. I did some testing and found certain words work fine while others never match.
DONT WORK: male, female...
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
----Are you a man or a woman?
--------+ (male|man|boy|guy) [0]
--------I like chatting with (key1)s.
--------+ (female|woman|girl|chick) [0]
--------I like chatting with other (key1)s.
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: man
My bot goes to xnone
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: I am a man
My bot: I like chatting with men.
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: woman
My bot goes to xnone
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: I am a girl
My bot: I like chatting with other girls.
"man" is considered as "Blank Message" By the AI.
"boy" is recognised but gives "Linkages: null linkages found: 1 1; Valid Linkages: 1; Null Count: 2"
WORK AS EXPECTED: bot, human, numbers...
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
----Are you a bot or a human?
--------+ (human|bot|ghost) [0]
--------I like chatting with (key1)s.
...
My bot : Are you a bot or a human?
Chatter: human
My bot: I like chatting with humans.
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
----How old are you?
--------+ (17|18|19|20|21) [0]
--------Only (key1), well youre a few years younger than me
My bot: How old are you?.
Chatter: 21
My bot: Only 21, well youre a few years younger than me.
? ? ? ?
I have been using plugins in seeks successfully for several months, but now my bots arent responding to the seeks anymore, particularly when the other chatter replies with a single word instead of a complete phrase. I did some testing and found certain words work fine while others never match.
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: man
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: I am a man
My bot: I like chatting with men.
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: woman
...
My bot : Are you a man or a woman?
Chatter: I am a girl
My bot: I like chatting with other girls.
"man" is considered as "Blank Message" By the AI.
"boy" is recognised but gives "Linkages: null linkages found: 1 1; Valid Linkages: 1; Null Count: 2"
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
...
My bot : Are you a bot or a human?
Chatter: human
My bot: I like chatting with humans.
Phrase to trigger test [25,0]
My bot: How old are you?.
Chatter: 21
My bot: Only 21, well youre a few years younger than me.
Maybe "man" and "boy" at the beginning of a sentence (without grammar around them) are filtered out, the way that "well" and "so" at the beginning of a sentence are (I think) filtered out.
That would sort of make sense.
That would sort of make sense.
That would explain some problems I've started having with "man" and "dude" lately. Some of my keyphrases containing them have stopped working.
The same thing happens with a regular expression I use to recognise e-mail addresses. Youd be amazed if you knew how many guest-chatters give there e-mail address to my bot after asking "what do you look like", in the hope Ill send them a picture. LOL
First I tried :
.+@.+ (re)
Neither normal , nor Raw mode works when the address is the only answer, but it works when something precedes or follows.
Then I tried different variations etc.:
^.+@.+ (re)
\\w+@.+ (re)- \\w means any alphanumerical character, so it was good enough for testing but Im not sure about underscores and dots
[^ ]\\w@.+ (re) [^ ] is an attempt to exclude leading spaces
^[^ ]\\w@.+ (re)
It doesnt make any difference; they only work if there is more than one word in the response.
First I tried :
Neither normal , nor Raw mode works when the address is the only answer, but it works when something precedes or follows.
Then I tried different variations etc.:
\\w+@.+ (re)
It doesnt make any difference; they only work if there is more than one word in the response.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar