Bug Stomp

Hey Lili, don't be discourged! Post more of your bugs and we'll try to help exterminate them, one by one!

xcompliment overpowers keyphrases:

Immaculada: But why naked? Are you an exhibitionist, sweetheart?
Julie Tinkerbell: Thanks! That was a nice thing to say.

Immaculada: But I thought your name was Julie Tinkerbell, sweetheart.
Julie Tinkerbell: The feeling is mutual.

Although the results can be funny sometimes, I'd still prefer that Julie answer the question or respond to the statement, rather than being so flattered over being called sweetheart that she ignores the content of the message.

Nothing against Sunnie or anything, but I can't help but notice that his hotness seems to be locked at 599 (never higher, never lower) for the last couple of days, where as everyone elses hotness seems to drop normally.

-

um... +?

=?

e^(i*Pi) + 1 = 0

I'm familiar with all your notation except . Is that another constant?

It represents the speed of light in a vacuum (just when the filter needs to be changed).

Aaah...that could be the problem. Yeah, I wish we could rate xphrases lower...I wish they wouldn't have priority. It just makes no sense when they respond like that sometimes.

my keyphrase that was caught was this:
why are you * (happy_feeling)
that has the response: I'm usually pretty (key2). I'm just a (key2) person, I guess.

So, why did this happen?

Shara Menski: That's nice. Why are you glad that I am glad?
Julie Tinkerbell: I'm usually pretty (key2). I'm just a (key2) person, I guess.

"glad" had to have been caught as (happy_feeling), or the response wouldn't have been triggered- so why did the (key2) show?

thanks

Hey Ezzer, I've sort of been having that problem too. The 'coding' in the response keeps showing up.