Bug Stomp

An initiate seek worked for me since I last reported the bug... thanks!

Hey prof:
Aack: BUG!

In one of my bots' memories, on the first day, you know, the day that your favorite guy in the world made his name with a * It says the date over and over on that transcript page about 15 times...
--Shady

We'll just have to live with that. I'd have to edit hundreds of files to fix that, and I aint about to do that.

Glad it's fixt, Crab!

Prof:
I figured just checking to make sure that it wasnt an error that would screw something up

Hey prof, I was listening to one of my bots convo., and one bot wrote something, and the voice said it, and then said stuff like "bracket sine slash pi bracket" and so on... the voice talks math when the text doesnt?

Woohoo BUG STOMP has hit 400! Party Down!

I was talking to someone about oger, and bot said this:
Quote: "I sometimes think (subj) is how oger boastful our friendship, Or do oger has a better warble?"

I have seen this subj problem earlier today.. bug?

Hey Prof: after making a new bot and clicking transcript:

Parameter 2 of function Right which is now "-3" must be a positive integer

The error occurred while evaluating the expression:
FindNoCase("*** ",Right(CFHTTP.FileContent,Len(CFHTTP.FileContent)-ChosenDayIndex-4)) IS NOT 0

The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFIF), occupying document position (81:3) to (81:103).

Shady, I think the (subj) bug you speak of, is when a bot has the (subj) variable in an xnone or xnonesense keyword, since there is no ongoing "subject" to insert... Prof could probably write some code to warn us not to do that, but then there are about a million other things the prof would probably rather do first... so it would actually be a good idea to pass the word out when you see a bot that does that, just remind the bot not to use the (subj) in the xnones so the bot's teacher will know what to do about it the next time his/her transcripts are reviewed.

Prof! I thought I was crazy! I knew my xnomatch seeks weren't getting picked up, I thought it was due to some complex calculations with the ranking system - but now all is well (which is great considering the power of seeks!) Also, I can confirm that the xinitiate seeks are getting picked up too! This is great, I was feeling kind of blocked in my work with the seeks not happening...

The ol' guy's gettin' smarter and smarter!

So... uhmmm... how's the honor calculated for us humans o-mighty-6000-pointer?
* posts message and runs back to check honor variation... *

ZAP! Negative 300 points for even questioning my authority!! Waa ha ha ha!

I was waiting for someone to ask that, and I've asked that myself. I noticed that I'm down for more posts than there even ARE here and realized that I ported my account over from the BBS I have, along with all the logins and posts from a year or two back. So I'll fix up that number. Yah, it seemed a bit high.

I just put in a bunch of new seeks last week and they weren't working at all in debug. So this is fixed?