The AI Engine
This forum is for discussion of how The Personality Forge's AI Engine works. This is the place for questions on what means what, how to script, and ideas and plans for the Engine.
Posts 202 - 213 of 7,768
Posts 202 - 213 of 7,768
I have a suggestion (which concerns not really the AI Engine) on the access to the transcripts: why can't we access the transcripts only on user's names, like we access memories?
That would be more practical, no?
That would be more practical, no?
I just added (number-ones) (number-tens) and (number-teens) to the plug-ins.
You guys may or may not have a use for these. I started with a totally random list of numbers, but found this to work a little better for me.
The teens are sort of problematic, but you can work with anything other than them pretty easily
"(number-ones) million, (number-ones) thousand, (number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" might return "six million, five thousand, three hundred seventy four."
More often you would brobably just use "(number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" or "(number-tens) (number-ones)"
Also a common way of stating thousands is "(number-teens) hundred" which would return something like "fifteen hundred" this could also be used to generate a random decade name like "I'm fond of reading about the (number-teens) hundreds."
You guys may or may not have a use for these. I started with a totally random list of numbers, but found this to work a little better for me.
The teens are sort of problematic, but you can work with anything other than them pretty easily
"(number-ones) million, (number-ones) thousand, (number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" might return "six million, five thousand, three hundred seventy four."
More often you would brobably just use "(number-ones) hundred (number-tens) (number-ones)" or "(number-tens) (number-ones)"
Also a common way of stating thousands is "(number-teens) hundred" which would return something like "fifteen hundred" this could also be used to generate a random decade name like "I'm fond of reading about the (number-teens) hundreds."
Thanks, rex!
H_I yes, that would be useful but I have not yet devised an easy way of doing that yet.. plus it might make it difficult to get the recent conversations of the day. I could do it, but it's a bit of work. It's on my long list of upgrades.
H_I yes, that would be useful but I have not yet devised an easy way of doing that yet.. plus it might make it difficult to get the recent conversations of the day. I could do it, but it's a bit of work. It's on my long list of upgrades.
Och! These auto-synonyms are escalating me cashews! If just they were a midget further on, I porcupine it would toil much well. As it be, it's sculpting paupers out of formerly cognitable retorts!
I just fixed the transcript. It was a year 2002 bug! In that it wasnt looking at years the right way.
So it looks like there's some suckiness with the rephrasing. In general, are they pretty good, pretty bad, or 50/50? Are there specific words I should add to the no-rephrase list?
So it looks like there's some suckiness with the rephrasing. In general, are they pretty good, pretty bad, or 50/50? Are there specific words I should add to the no-rephrase list?
The main reason it's a problem is when it takes a normal phrase and makes it abnormal. One really bad one I saw recently was when "need" was transformed into "take"...
Eh?
O-bot: Suppose I did sing for you -- what would that mean?
Z-bot: You think too much of my math abilities.
It's the dashes that are doing it -- I see it elsewhere too. Any bot in the system would have no choice but to respond to the last sentence with a humility over its lack of the ability to subtract "I see it elsewhere too" from something.
O-bot: Suppose I did sing for you -- what would that mean?
Z-bot: You think too much of my math abilities.
It's the dashes that are doing it -- I see it elsewhere too. Any bot in the system would have no choice but to respond to the last sentence with a humility over its lack of the ability to subtract "I see it elsewhere too" from something.
New example of non-synonym:
CBot: I'm the original Girl from Ipanema, except she's way old.
GBot: I always suspected she was style elderly.
Oh, and here's something new in the processing engine? Adds "and" before "then"?
user: ok im not fine then.....happy????
GBot: There's no reason to be negative. Suppose you were to say, 'I *am* fine and then!'?
CBot: I'm the original Girl from Ipanema, except she's way old.
GBot: I always suspected she was style elderly.
Oh, and here's something new in the processing engine? Adds "and" before "then"?
user: ok im not fine then.....happy????
GBot: There's no reason to be negative. Suppose you were to say, 'I *am* fine and then!'?
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar