The AI Engine

Just to be sure, have you both tried it in another browser? I haven't had that issue here, but I've had very similar issues (e.g. 'You must enter a password!' when I did) on other sites with certain browsers in the past.

I am trying to get the bot to recognize when someone just types in the alphabet. It works for upper case but not lower. Used (re) raw. any ideas?
You: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Bot: Perhaps, I've done you a terrible injustice.?

You: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Bot: OH, the alphabet song.

If anyone is willing and it sounds like something you'd like, I've been working on a new sex bot called CuteBunnyGirl. She's a furry, so you've gotta be into that sort of thing. Anyway, I'd really like some transcripts to read for some suggestions and ideas.

I know I'm skipping basics and trying to get my bot to do some advanced stuff but, how do I get my bot to remember me and other people it chats with? Do I have to make a key-phrase for when someone ask "Do you remember me?" Or is it something to do with X-keywords?

How do I make my bot recognize that "Who're you?" = "Who are you?" an so on with other such things?

Do seeks not work on xinitiate? I have a simple yes no seek but my bot won't respond to either of them.

For the first two, you can find out in the book of AI. for the xinitiate problem, I don't know.

who are you should cover who're you. Things like
you are will cover you're etc.
the keyphrase would look like

seeks seldom work in xinitiate.

I don't know how well The Professor takes to suggestions, but my #1 would be for negative seeks. That is, some way to say 'if the user's response does not contain this, move on to this'.

Very often, I find myself trying to squeeze in more characters than are allowed in a seek because I'm trying to cover the most probable responses that aren't something I'd want to break out of a seek chain, when it would be much quicker to specify what those exceptions should be.

EDIT: Although, explaining this has made me think that I could use a soft wildcard seek and then <?PF if (key1) is not "exception1"; if (key1) is not "exception2"; ?> and so on. Silly me.

Couldn't you use (*) as a seek to encompass everything you don't have a seek for? But you'd need a way to rank it under your other seeks.
I don't know if you can do that. I'm a newbie. :-)

That's what I normally do, but unfortunately, that often seems to result in the bot going to that response no matter what the user's input is, whether it's specified in another seek or not.

Sometimes it works as you describe, but much of the time it goes to the wildcard regardless.

Before the relaunch of PF, it seemed like you could rank the wildcard seek below the other seeks by ensuring that it sat above them (as if seeks were read from the bottom, up), but that doesn't seem reliable anymore.

Also, I've now learned that my if (key1)<0> workaround isn't valid. Hmph. So I guess the suggestion stands.