Seasons

This is a forum or general chit-chat, small talk, a "hey, how ya doing?" and such. Or hell, get crazy deep on something. Whatever you like.

Posts 5,416 - 5,427 of 6,170

17 years ago #5416
LOL. Someone obviously didn't do their homework on chatbots...

17 years ago #5417
Maybe it was a modified Alice clone or something. Not that Alice says things like that, but a clone that was then turned into Santa might.

17 years ago #5418
Yeah, I was thinking the chatter repeated "eat it" to trigger some sort of KP for oral sex that was in the base personality (in the way the PF will give us those odd synonyms or spell check matches ever so often). Also, the insult was clearly repeating back what the chatter said.

17 years ago #5419
Yet another reason to stop bothering my bots for more than stories:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu0TXl15PgU

Don't Date Robots!

17 years ago #5420
Bonjour tout le monde !! y a t 'il quelqu'un svp qui pourrait un peu m'expliquer le fonctionnement de ce site ? je croyais que c'était un site où l'on pouvait créer un avatar animé avec une certaine intelligence artificielle mais je pense que c pas çà .... pffffffPouvez vous svp m'aider (en français si possible) d'avance MERCIIIIIII

17 years ago #5421
Irena if you are out there still (or any physics buff who cares to answer), can you give me a "For Dummies" summary of quantum decoherance and environmental entanglement?

I am having a discussion with someone who is quoting "What the Bleep do we Know" as evidence to assert quantum computers would be able to pick up the user's intention and act on them when processing data. I told him it is amazing enough to get quantum computers to the point where they can process data all (which we admittedly have done) without trying to make crystal balls and magic wands out of them, but I think I should add more science to my argument. Help?

17 years ago #5422
Last I heard, entanglement requires two particles that start out together in the same system. So unless the computer is streaming particles into your brain and back out, that seems extremely unlikely. I suppose you could try to argue that the wavefunctions from the particles in the computer are large enough to overlap with those in your brain, but, again, I've never heard of a system where that was true.

This might be more helpful:

http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/04/what_the_bleep_.html

17 years ago #5423
Uh oh. They've found R.O.U.S.'s!

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/dn13089-giant-rat-and-new-possum-found-in-indonesia.html?feedId=online-news_rss20

17 years ago #5424
Y'all are scarin' me. Giant rats. I object to normal rats. Explain again to me why the extinction of giant rats would be a bad thing, because I don't see the connection. I mean, if it involved something cute like penguins or polar bears (who, btw, see us as appetizers), I could see it. Don't melt the ice. But I think the rats can safely go extinct.

Man, and it's Christmas and everything. All I'm gonna think about is giant rats. And that particle stuff just makes me feel dizzy. You reckon there are particle-sized rats?

17 years ago #5425
Thanks Ulrike!

Also thanks for for the rats of mass destruction. Am I mis-reading, or is this a new type of rat (to us) rather than an endangered rat? Either way, boo illegal logging, even for the sake slimly creatures.

17 years ago #5426
Rodents Of Unusual Size? I don't think they exist.

17 years ago #5427
I think we should make sure that giant rats become an endangered species and then I think they should become extinct.


Posts 5,416 - 5,427 of 6,170

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar