Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 5,014 - 5,025 of 8,681
Posts 5,014 - 5,025 of 8,681
That last one would be difficult because it would probably be updated in the time between you exporting and importing the Inner Life file.
But amen to the first suggestion.
But amen to the first suggestion.
While importing Inner Life may not be advisable, I often wished I could export it to Excel. It would be cool if we could for instance look up all chatters for whom a memory has a certain value.
Help...Frizella still thinks her name is a verb:
Patty: Oh! Why not Frizella?
Frizella: I can't, Patty, I just can't Frizella right now. It's an interesting idea, but...no. I'm not going to Frizella.
Edited: Actually, it's matching (*) in the keyphrase, not (verb), but shouldn't she recognize her own name and not use it as wildcard?<0>
Patty: Oh! Why not Frizella?
Frizella: I can't, Patty, I just can't Frizella right now. It's an interesting idea, but...no. I'm not going to Frizella.
Edited: Actually, it's matching (*) in the keyphrase, not (verb), but shouldn't she recognize her own name and not use it as wildcard?<0>
I know, but I was thinking that a bots own name processes differently than other words and phrases. In debug, it *does* recognize her name as a name and strip it from the processing if I ask Why not Frizella?:
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
OK, here's a Frizella that shouldn't work this way:
Julie Tinkerbell: Anything for you, Frizella.
Frizella: Really, direct orders don't go over too well; when you just say ' frizella ' it doesn't make me want to be very helpful.
That's an xcommand response.
Julie Tinkerbell: Anything for you, Frizella.
Frizella: Really, direct orders don't go over too well; when you just say ' frizella ' it doesn't make me want to be very helpful.
That's an xcommand response.
On that odd note, I noticed that Star Trek is being picked up in some contexts as a command, as well.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar