Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 5,008 - 5,019 of 8,682
Posts 5,008 - 5,019 of 8,682
It's a pain, but you could have two separate keyphrases: what is your least favorite sport
what is your least favorite (kind of|type of) sport
I've had to do that with some of mine.
what is your least favorite (kind of|type of) sport
I've had to do that with some of mine.
well anything created by humans is going to be imperfect and in defense of the prof (who needs no defense) trying to program AI to make bots make some kind os sense is a art and not a science and very difficult to do.
We know this, and we love the Prof- I'm sure no one was being critical. This is Bug Stomp, and we're posting bugs.
I did bypass my "optional" problem by creating multiple keyphrases in several instances, but poor Frizella's languge center is looking a little bloated as a result. 
In Inner Life, once you edit a memory in one of the categories of smilies (, , , , , None, 
, , , and ), it brings you back to the lastest chats. Would it be possible to make it go back to the section you were just in, instead?
Like, if you were in the 5x section, and edited one profile, and saved it, you'd go back to the 5x list.
Also.. What about an import/export for Inner Life?
, , , , , None, , , , and ), it brings you back to the lastest chats. Would it be possible to make it go back to the section you were just in, instead?Like, if you were in the 5x
section, and edited one profile, and saved it, you'd go back to the 5x list.Also.. What about an import/export for Inner Life?
That last one would be difficult because it would probably be updated in the time between you exporting and importing the Inner Life file.
But amen to the first suggestion.
But amen to the first suggestion.
While importing Inner Life may not be advisable, I often wished I could export it to Excel. It would be cool if we could for instance look up all chatters for whom a memory has a certain value.
Help...Frizella still thinks her name is a verb:
Patty: Oh! Why not Frizella?
Frizella: I can't, Patty, I just can't Frizella right now. It's an interesting idea, but...no. I'm not going to Frizella.
Edited: Actually, it's matching (*) in the keyphrase, not (verb), but shouldn't she recognize her own name and not use it as wildcard?<0>
Patty: Oh! Why not Frizella?
Frizella: I can't, Patty, I just can't Frizella right now. It's an interesting idea, but...no. I'm not going to Frizella.
Edited: Actually, it's matching (*) in the keyphrase, not (verb), but shouldn't she recognize her own name and not use it as wildcard?<0>
I know, but I was thinking that a bots own name processes differently than other words and phrases. In debug, it *does* recognize her name as a name and strip it from the processing if I ask Why not Frizella?:
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar