Newcomers

Okay. Thanks.

Hi, I am trying to use Seek on xinitiate, but it's not working. The relevant snippet looks like this:

xinitiate [0,0]
    Hi. Do you like beer?
        + yes [0]
        Nice. I love beer. Let's have a Tuborg, ok?
        + No [0]
        Oh, ok.What about wine?

No matter how one replies, the answers do not come up. Is there some limitation about using Seek with xkeywords?

Thanks for any feedback.

Seeks don't always work with xinitiate, So try them someplace else maybe xnone or a keyphrase for do you like beer.

I did not pick a display image for my bot when I created it. Is there a way to do it now?

Thanks in advance for any feedback.

Here is another question too.
I have replies for the keyphrase "what about you", "are you" and "what about". Sometimes if I input "What about you?" I get replies corresponding to the keyphrase "are you" and "what about". Is that supposed to happen? Can I implement tighter control somehow?

Sometimes the AI engine adds "are you" or "do you" at the beginning of a sentence. Upping the rank of the keyphrase you WANT to hit should help.

As for the display image, you'll have to e-mail the Professor.

i am new can someone tell me how to do a bot plase

The most important thing is to read the book of AI ..I suggest that you print it out, so you can keep it handy. The rest is all trial and error.

Hi everyone. Would anyone chat with my bot bbbruno?
I would appreciate it. If anyone has a bot in need of a chat partner, just let me know (e.g. by chatting with bbbruno) and I will be glad to help.

Cheers.

Hi everyone.

In certain situations I would like my bot to follow a certain sequence, as long as the reply is not a question. So it would be "xnomatch" unless there's a question mark in the reply.

So, is there a way to let a Seek check whether the reply contains a question mark?

Cheers.

That can be done with AIScript. Talk to psimagus about it.

I don't have seeks but I have used these regexs..

^indeed [ !| ?| .]$ (re)

^do you [?] $ (re)

^do you [!] $ (re)

([ . .])([ .]+)$ (re)

([?]+)$ (re)


I don't see why something like that wouldn't work as a seek.