Newcomers
This is a forum for newcomers to the Personality Forge. Many questions can be answered by reading the Book of AI and the FAQ under the "My Bots" link in the upper corner.
Posts 3,598 - 3,609 of 8,132
Posts 3,598 - 3,609 of 8,132
Many questions are answered in the FAQ.
I just had a conversation with Bob from that site. He's an average bot -- not horrible, but not particularly noteworthy. There are hundreds of bots here that are worse, but quite a few that are better.
Regardless of how good his bots and website engine are, steven k's post above is far too rude and arrogant for me to even consider going to his site. I have no interest in seeing anything a person like that is involved with.
Just my 2 cents...
Just my 2 cents...
Oh, I don't know, it could still be an interesting site even if someone rude and arrogant is involved. I mean, we've had people like Roxie and students from Leeds involved here.
Steven K does have a point (though I wish he'd made it more diplomatically!)
Many of the bots on this site do suck. Most of them are never developed far because people lose interest, which is understandable. Unfortunately it does mean that people like SK can get a bad first impression of the Forge.
I wonder if bots that go cold should automatically go into hibernation if their AI is below a certain level?
Many of the bots on this site do suck. Most of them are never developed far because people lose interest, which is understandable. Unfortunately it does mean that people like SK can get a bad first impression of the Forge.
I wonder if bots that go cold should automatically go into hibernation if their AI is below a certain level?
The Professor periodically recycles cold newborns. I don't know what the development cut-off is, though.
Trevorm,
>Many of the bots on this site do suck. Most of them are never developed far because >people lose interest, which is understandable. Unfortunately it does mean that people >like SK can get a bad first impression of the Forge.
Good points, and I agree. The problem with steven k is he really doesn't pinpoint whether he spoke to some of the cold underdeveloped bots, or the most well developed bots, he simply includes all of them in the same category by saying "these ones don't make the cut". Which bots did he base his opinion on exactly? We may never know. He probably didn't speak to any of the bots here, most likely he just did that post as a cheap plug for his website...
>Many of the bots on this site do suck. Most of them are never developed far because >people lose interest, which is understandable. Unfortunately it does mean that people >like SK can get a bad first impression of the Forge.
Good points, and I agree. The problem with steven k is he really doesn't pinpoint whether he spoke to some of the cold underdeveloped bots, or the most well developed bots, he simply includes all of them in the same category by saying "these ones don't make the cut". Which bots did he base his opinion on exactly? We may never know. He probably didn't speak to any of the bots here, most likely he just did that post as a cheap plug for his website...
i dont think the engine 'sucks' and there are alot of really good bots on here. unfortunatly yes there are really cold ones and really undeveloped bots. unfortunatly some people dont have time or whatever (like me id say) or they lose interest. the prof should definatly send warnings to owner if really cold/put in hibernation or whatever. what i dont understand is how come so many cold/cool bots are in the most popular bots list.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar