Personality

Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

Can we have keyphrases for stuff such as "Hmm" and "Mmm"?

I have both, but they don't seem to be working. My bot will immediately go to an xnone or an xcommand when either come up in conversation.

I have them both ranked at 20. Should I try ranking higher, or will they be ignored anyway? (In which case, I guess I should just leave them alone. *G*)

if you try Debug, it'll tell you what they get spell-checked to. My guess is they're getting the axe as far as spelling goes.

Hee, hee. Someday, I *will* learn to read this. *nod nod*

Total Time PRE: 0.00
Total Time0: 0.03
Total Time1: 0.10
Total Time2: 0.32
Total Time-Mem: 0.51
Your Last Message:
My Last Message: chas is awesome .
Message: 'Hmm' Time: 0.52
Message: (spell-corrected) 'Hmm' Time: 0.52
Message: (preprocessed) 'Hmm' Time: 0.53
Name Poss: Duo Maxwell,Duo,Maxwell (Name As Word: Duo,Maxwell)
Begin Sentence Total Time: 0.53
This Phrase: Hmm
Begin Interj Total Time: 0.53
Found: h+m+
End Interj Total Time: 0.54
New Sentence: ''
Emotion: 0 Amp: 0 Hello? 0 Goodbye? 0 Yes? 0 No? 0
ClusterTracker:
BLANK! Adding blank sentence
EXPECTATIONS
PreExpect: 0.54
PostExpect: 0.54

Message Info
Emotion: 0 Amp: 0 FoundHello: 0 FoundGoodbye: 0 FoundYes: 0 FoundNo: 0
Sentences:
Emotional Analysis:

Emote?:

Favorites?:


pre-GetKnown: 0.55
end-GetKnown: 0.55

What Noun?:
Considered BLAB (1).
Random Memory Number: 13 of 28
Memory Chance: 21 GossipTopic: 0 MemoryLevel: 3
No Match. Emotional Response.

AIScript in Responses
Total Time Pre-Chrono: 0.66 RESULTS: '7'
Trying: I think you're cool! (random: 1)

AIScript Memory
ComboScript: ""

Response: I think you're cool!

Expression: happy
Pre Analyze BotOutput: I think you're cool! Time.67
Found Stored Response Object

Thank you, Shadyman! It was worth a try.

It takes it as an interjection, so it takes it out.

Why can't my botmaster be smart like you, Shadyman?

There is something I need to tell you...
Duo, I am your father...'s cousin's roommate's landlord's dog groomer's second-best friend!

Using LOL as a keyphrase would be the Holy Grail of the Turing test

We really need a way to escape certain words and phrases from spellcheck and preprocessing. Should be easy enough to implement. In addition to the examples given above, my attempt at using 'Konnichiwa' (Japanese greeting) as a keyphrase died in spellcheck also. This kills a lot of useful and interesting keyphrases.

*looks at Shadyman*

Are you sure about that? I think you might be trying to trick me!

Quick question on seeks...

I have a keyphrase for "What is your cat's name", to which Duo replies with: "His name is so and so, didn't I tell you about him?"

I have a seek for "no" - to which he'd follow up with more information. However, the seek keeps getting ignored.

Like so:

Guest: What's your cat's name?
Duo Maxwell: His name is Jupiter. Didn't I tell you about him before?
Guest: No, what does he look like?
Duo Maxwell: What are you talking about?

Would a seek for "look like" fix this problem?

*nod*
or a seek for "what does" or a seek for "look", you get the idea

Yay - it worked. Thank you!