Personality

Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

Hm. But if I use the second one, then I might need to use both (key1) and (postkey) for something like "You're trying too hard" - right?

Otherwise my bot would interpret "too" as (key1) and it would need (postkey) for "hard".

(Or am I doing this wrong?)

And thank you for being so helpful, Shadyman! I really appreciate it.

I'm not sure if * takes more than one word. this is the eternal question that's been plaguing Steve.

If it does take more than one word, you would just need (key1). If it only takes one word, you would need to use (key1) and (postkey), in which case it would be easier to use just (postkey) in the first place and not even bother with the *

The * will take any number of words. It's better to use (postkey) and not put the * at the end of the Keyphrase. I dont even know if it'll let you.

Thank you both, Professor and Shadyman!

I'm gonna go with (postkey) because that's what seems to be working.

(And btw, yeah - I can use * at the end of the keyphrase. The Forge allowed me to do so.)

Can we have keyphrases for stuff such as "Hmm" and "Mmm"?

I have both, but they don't seem to be working. My bot will immediately go to an xnone or an xcommand when either come up in conversation.

I have them both ranked at 20. Should I try ranking higher, or will they be ignored anyway? (In which case, I guess I should just leave them alone. *G*)

if you try Debug, it'll tell you what they get spell-checked to. My guess is they're getting the axe as far as spelling goes.

Hee, hee. Someday, I *will* learn to read this. *nod nod*

Total Time PRE: 0.00
Total Time0: 0.03
Total Time1: 0.10
Total Time2: 0.32
Total Time-Mem: 0.51
Your Last Message:
My Last Message: chas is awesome .
Message: 'Hmm' Time: 0.52
Message: (spell-corrected) 'Hmm' Time: 0.52
Message: (preprocessed) 'Hmm' Time: 0.53
Name Poss: Duo Maxwell,Duo,Maxwell (Name As Word: Duo,Maxwell)
Begin Sentence Total Time: 0.53
This Phrase: Hmm
Begin Interj Total Time: 0.53
Found: h+m+
End Interj Total Time: 0.54
New Sentence: ''
Emotion: 0 Amp: 0 Hello? 0 Goodbye? 0 Yes? 0 No? 0
ClusterTracker:
BLANK! Adding blank sentence
EXPECTATIONS
PreExpect: 0.54
PostExpect: 0.54

Message Info
Emotion: 0 Amp: 0 FoundHello: 0 FoundGoodbye: 0 FoundYes: 0 FoundNo: 0
Sentences:
Emotional Analysis:

Emote?:

Favorites?:


pre-GetKnown: 0.55
end-GetKnown: 0.55

What Noun?:
Considered BLAB (1).
Random Memory Number: 13 of 28
Memory Chance: 21 GossipTopic: 0 MemoryLevel: 3
No Match. Emotional Response.

AIScript in Responses
Total Time Pre-Chrono: 0.66 RESULTS: '7'
Trying: I think you're cool! (random: 1)

AIScript Memory
ComboScript: ""

Response: I think you're cool!

Expression: happy
Pre Analyze BotOutput: I think you're cool! Time.67
Found Stored Response Object

Thank you, Shadyman! It was worth a try.

It takes it as an interjection, so it takes it out.

Why can't my botmaster be smart like you, Shadyman?

There is something I need to tell you...
Duo, I am your father...'s cousin's roommate's landlord's dog groomer's second-best friend!

Using LOL as a keyphrase would be the Holy Grail of the Turing test

We really need a way to escape certain words and phrases from spellcheck and preprocessing. Should be easy enough to implement. In addition to the examples given above, my attempt at using 'Konnichiwa' (Japanese greeting) as a keyphrase died in spellcheck also. This kills a lot of useful and interesting keyphrases.