Personality

Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

whole thing

the whole thing, but could you make another one that works like (postkey) does now?

Is there any markers on the (verb)'s and such that might indicate other stuff, like plurality and tense?
"My * (verb_past)"
=>"It did?"

"My (noun_pl) (verb_pres)"
=>"My (key1) do too"

...or whatever.

What's are daytime popsicles anyway?

I'll make you into a daytime popsicle if you don't realize that was an example!

...
I don't even know how to respond to that. I think I'll just keep quiet.

You may have won this battle, young one, but the war is far from over. Yeah.
Yeah.

*Does the happy dance*
I AM THE LIZARD QUEEN!
Waitaminit... Prof? Has there been any reported cases of using someone else's response from PF humanoids?

in bug stomp

Turing's Dad- that's a good idea. But man! A bit of work to get that going. But yah, it would be very useful.

Okay, I'm switching (key#), (prekey) and (postkey) to be the entire response. For those trying them out, let me know how that seems. (subj) will remain as it was.

so (subj) is the short response, then, and (postkey) is everything after the keyphrase?

that's what the professor said and what I have encountered.

Aha! I better get working on changing all the (subj)s then because they sound corny in the context...

On that note, prof, when is import planned to be released?