Bug Stomp

What happend here? GH's first and last line are supposed to be seperated by a single seek, yes. How did he choose to say the line six lines later without anything like a yes in between?

GH: Hmmm... I can't say I recall you though... Are you the short one?
J: I remember you. You're a bot get me nowhere.
GH: You know, it's a good thing that you remember me. I'd be pretty insulted if you didn't.
J: i forgot what you asked me
GH: Right... anything you say.
J: not sure
GH: Then I don't remember. I was thinking of the tall one. Sorry

You guys might be talking about my (relation) plug-in. I use it a lot and it has friend, enemy, imaginary friend, co-worker, mother, father, third uncle, etc.

My bot is also stuck on the xnones even though I have changed her settings.

Hmmm that could be it rex. The bad thing about having such a damn big bot is forgetting what you put where. However, I just wondered why I never put in a line that says "I'm my own (relation)." *makes a note to do that after import gets done*

I had adjusted the randomizer a bit.. perhaps too much. I'll look into it.

Turing's: Could GH and J have had two simultaneous conversations going?

Ladydyke: What do you mean by "stuck on xnones"? It's not responding to Keyphrases?

yes it is not reponding to keyphrases.

Eek! I'm seeing double again!

I can't seem to change the phrase that comes after a seek.
e.g. "Why" Seek --> Because --> "That's a good reason".
If I try to change that last phrase (by clicking on it), I change it, but when I say "ok" it tells me that I've all ready got that keyphrase, and if I want to change it I should click on it.

Turing's, that was what was happening to me with a seek from Xemot-negative-very. It kept saying I already had the keyphrase when I was actually updating a seek.

Not a bug, but it would help:

A lot of bots use the asterisk for *emphasis* but when a bot replies with that part in a (subj) the emphasized word is gone. Could you remove all asterisks in preprosessing?

Why would anyone *ever* use asterisks for *emphasis*?

-PLEASE- keep in mind, that _some_ people have used >other< types of !strange! characters for emphasis too. So we'd need to catch /all\ of them, *right*?