Bot Contest
Here I'll be posting information on various Bot contests that challenge and test a Bot's AI and realism. Feel free to post comments and updates on contests, as well as announcements for new contests.
Posts 1,447 - 1,458 of 4,091
Posts 1,447 - 1,458 of 4,091
View Contest Winners in the Hall of Fame.
What I meant was that on the 26th they were in a state of being turned off. Since the 23rd was three days earlier, this was a true statement.
Ok, I have a rant to give... (Caps alert...)
IS JUDGE 2 IN HIS/HER RIGHT MIND? IS IT THE SAME JUDGE?
Explaination: Seriously, Haylie, who got 3, should have had more than Peedy, who got 10 (All Peedy did was give canned 'xNones'), while Haylie at least answered one or two questions... Then there are other bots who you say 'how did they get 45 when they deserve 15' and others who are 'how did they get 15 when they deserve 45'? Like Little Mu for example...
I've got all of Judge2's scorings on a graph and, tied for first for number of times the score is given are: 15 and 19, and in second is 14, and tied for third are: 0, 18, and 22.
In another method of looking at the numbers...
5% (~2 bots) were > 40 score
75% were < 20
the other 20% were between 20 and 32... Amazing the size of gap from 32 and 40.
If there are that many getting 0, and bots like Peedy getting 10, all is not right in the world. No offence to Peedy or it's botmaster or anything, it BOMBED the 15 questions. There are some bots who at least got 1 question who got 0, while Peedy got 10...
Enough run-on sentences and poor grammatical structures, there's my rant for the moment. Case in point, Judge2 should think about rescoring. Judge1 and 3 rant to possibly follow later
IS JUDGE 2 IN HIS/HER RIGHT MIND? IS IT THE SAME JUDGE?
Explaination: Seriously, Haylie, who got 3, should have had more than Peedy, who got 10 (All Peedy did was give canned 'xNones'), while Haylie at least answered one or two questions... Then there are other bots who you say 'how did they get 45 when they deserve 15' and others who are 'how did they get 15 when they deserve 45'? Like Little Mu for example...
I've got all of Judge2's scorings on a graph and, tied for first for number of times the score is given are: 15 and 19, and in second is 14, and tied for third are: 0, 18, and 22.
In another method of looking at the numbers...
5% (~2 bots) were > 40 score
75% were < 20
the other 20% were between 20 and 32... Amazing the size of gap from 32 and 40.
If there are that many getting 0, and bots like Peedy getting 10, all is not right in the world. No offence to Peedy or it's botmaster or anything, it BOMBED the 15 questions. There are some bots who at least got 1 question who got 0, while Peedy got 10...
Enough run-on sentences and poor grammatical structures, there's my rant for the moment. Case in point, Judge2 should think about rescoring. Judge1 and 3 rant to possibly follow later
Shady,
Thanks for giving props to Mu. I don't think she deserved a 45, but she appreciates the thought.
Thanks for giving props to Mu. I don't think she deserved a 45, but she appreciates the thought.
Shadyman, I am seeing some off the wall scores as well however it would be a good idea to re-post your comments to the message board at the contest site as well. That way the judges will be able to see them and respond back.
Chris
Chris
...and taking out the lowest and highest is a very good idea... works in figure skating as well... except during the last olympics that is, lol
Chris, I would be more than happy to be a judge if need be, I would not score myself (Steve) higher than the contest transcript deserves him, same with any other bot.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar