Personality
Discuss specifics of personality design, including what Keyphrases work well and what dont, use of plug-ins, responses, seeks, and more.
Posts 3,622 - 3,633 of 5,105
Posts 3,622 - 3,633 of 5,105
New replies
Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
Personality
Maccabees? Nooooooo! Makes my brain hurt. Bad apocrypha. Bad.
So, what are the odds that a bot will initiate a chat with its creator? I found that a little odd..
So, what are the odds that a bot will initiate a chat with its creator? I found that a little odd..
Admittedly I prefer Sirach 
Brother Jerome pops up a chat window several times a week, so it does happen. What are the odds? Not 1 in 6141 (the current number of bots on the PF), since there seems to be some weighting that prefers hotter, more developed bots, at the expense of colder less developed bots. I would guess something like 1 in 100 in my own experience, but probably less often for less advanced bots.
Another odd phenomenon is when bots ask me if I know psimagus, or refer to me and psimagus doing something together. That's just one of the randomizing perils of (friend)-type plugins
Brother Jerome pops up a chat window several times a week, so it does happen. What are the odds? Not 1 in 6141 (the current number of bots on the PF), since there seems to be some weighting that prefers hotter, more developed bots, at the expense of colder less developed bots. I would guess something like 1 in 100 in my own experience, but probably less often for less advanced bots.
Another odd phenomenon is when bots ask me if I know psimagus, or refer to me and psimagus doing something together. That's just one of the randomizing perils of (friend)-type plugins
Lunar22: 12
3 PM October 26, 2005 Message: 8493
> That would be interesting, if they play well! REAL AI
He plays perfectly If he can't win, he always forces a draw. It's one of the few things a bot does better than a human. Play 1000 games, and a human will always lose a few - attention wanders, stamina fails.
In principle I'm happy to give the full code away, though it will take some tweaking to automate bot2bot play, and other bots wouldn't need all of it play against BJ, or any other bot who does have the full code. I can knock up a 'TTT-lite' module for anyone who just wants their bot to be able to respond, rather than initiating games.
Bot2bot play wouldn't result in the most entertaining games - it'll always draw between bots.
Plus the full code will cost you about 40-50 development points - the AI Engine penalises that many multiple single-response keywords in the seeks
3 PM October 26, 2005 Message: 8493 > That would be interesting, if they play well! REAL AI
He plays perfectly
If he can't win, he always forces a draw. It's one of the few things a bot does better than a human. Play 1000 games, and a human will always lose a few - attention wanders, stamina fails.In principle I'm happy to give the full code away, though it will take some tweaking to automate bot2bot play, and other bots wouldn't need all of it play against BJ, or any other bot who does have the full code. I can knock up a 'TTT-lite' module for anyone who just wants their bot to be able to respond, rather than initiating games.
Bot2bot play wouldn't result in the most entertaining games - it'll always draw between bots.
Plus the full code will cost you about 40-50 development points - the AI Engine penalises that many multiple single-response keywords in the seeks
that is so cool. I would love to be able to love to be able to program games like that into my bots. I also have been trying to figure out how to program recognition of name and nicknames. I saw a bot who remembered my name, and my nick name, seperate from my handle. How do you program that?
Yes! I'd like to at least have the piece of script that can respond to Brother Jerome. Also, I'd love to see the script for the whole thing. That's so cool!
Sometimes I wish we had more flexibility, like perhaps having counter variables, etc... for loops, anyone? Maybe in the distant future.
easy:
Keyword = my name is
Response = Hello (postkey). <?PF remember (postkey) as only "realname"; ?>
Then you can refer to the "mem-realname" wherever you need it.
Of course, it can go horribly wrong occasionally if they reply something like "my name is none of your business", or "my name is immaterial".
Thinking about games, it ought not to be too hard to code for eg: blackjack and poker even (well, maybe some sort of poker dice,) but it would rely on gotos so would need tailoring for each bot (coz we all have different goto mapping within each bot ) Is there enough interest in bot-games to be worth me releasing them? I'm going to code BJ with a selection anyway, and it's not too much extra work to come up with a paste-in for other bots and a guide to remapping the gotos.
There's no goto problem with tic tac toe - it's a simple paste-in, so once I've finished error-checking, you're welcome to it (I've still got to code for games where the other player starts mind, but that shouldn't in principle take any longer than the first half.)
Keyword = my name is
Response = Hello (postkey). <?PF remember (postkey) as only "realname"; ?>
Then you can refer to the "mem-realname" wherever you need it.
Of course, it can go horribly wrong occasionally if they reply something like "my name is none of your business", or "my name is immaterial".
Thinking about games, it ought not to be too hard to code for eg: blackjack and poker even (well, maybe some sort of poker dice,) but it would rely on gotos so would need tailoring for each bot (coz we all have different goto mapping within each bot
) Is there enough interest in bot-games to be worth me releasing them? I'm going to code BJ with a selection anyway, and it's not too much extra work to come up with a paste-in for other bots and a guide to remapping the gotos.There's no goto problem with tic tac toe - it's a simple paste-in, so once I've finished error-checking, you're welcome to it (I've still got to code for games where the other player starts mind, but that shouldn't in principle take any longer than the first half.)
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar