Newcomers

Irina, I have tried forcing those issues with +(*) [0], but that will override anything.

that will override anything.

Even repeated user input? That's the bane of my life ATM - when you're trying to drag a user along a chain of seeks, and it breaks with a "Boring, boring!" when they say "yes" twice in a row.

I am still getting xnomatch seeks skipped and xnones on the occasional keyphrase. It's almost like the AI engine doesn't go into full xnonitis, but has some good hiccups.

Psimagus, sorry. Not anything , just the other seeks you may want to have the bot pick up.

Prob, a silly question: are you using "xnomatch" or "(xnomatch)"?

It's not that I'm getting the wrong seek, it's taht instead of getting the one and only seek, which is an xnomatch, I get something else.

Bev: Perhaps the (*) will work better, Bev; thanks for the idea, I'll try it out!

wow ! am i pleasd about the chatterbox challenge who i voted for won!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bev, I use xnomatch, no () They have always worked before.

Thanks Prob. Just checking. I think I saw some with parentheses (was it on BJ's site?) and it made me wonder. They should work. For what it's worth, by bots drop those too now.

I'm also having trouble with seeks. I just had a + xnomatch overridden by an xemote.

I think I saw some with parentheses (was it on BJ's site?)

If so, it was a typo. I don't intentionally use brackets, since xnomatch isn't a plugin or a memory, and I wouldn't expect it to work with brackets.

Hi there. I'm new to the personality forge. I want to see how real life converts to virtual life. And I want to fool around in perverse manners with the bots.