Newcomers

^not much$ (re) 20,0 {?PF raw;?} works like a charm.

(not much--20--0--raw) That worked! Thank you very much! That's been bothering me for awhile now. It won't work on the seek for the life of me, though.

Don't forget to use the raw in the box on the seek

Put raw in the AI box. No change. "bottom _" is still an insult. Why o why.

ok - an unexpectedly tough nut - goto Overkill sledgehammer approach. Try:

[b][o]([t]+)[o][m] [l][e][f][t] (re)
[b][o]([t]+)[o][m] [r][i][g][h][t] (re)
[b][o]([t]+)[o][m] [m][i]([d]+)[l][e] (re)

and keep the raw mode. If that doesn't work, nothing will!

^bottom right$ (re) in raw mode, rank=30 works fine for me.

more anagrams..lol i like the dispute action one<0>
Non-compos-mentis leakage hairdo ritual elite
Non-compos-mentis leakage trailer audio lithe
Non-compos-mentis gorilla theatre adieu alike
Non-compos-mentis galilee hideout karate rail


Some extra anagrams for little monster 1<0>

Put raw in the AI box. No change. "bottom _" is still an insult. Why o why.
I don't even have it as a regular expression
prob123: bottom left
Bildgesmythe: Your right or my left...
prob123: bottom middle
Bildgesmythe: Oh, just there! Now I see it.
prob123: bottom right
Bildgesmythe: I still don't see it

I just have it as a string of positions
bottom left,upper left,lower left,lower right,bottom middle,bottom right 25,0

CHECK for emot settings, misspelling or some ai script that can't be met..there is not reason it doesnt' work for you

At the risk of seeming to suggest censorship, I wonder if it wouldn't be good to have a switch that lets us choose what level of bot can talk to us. Or a flag on the bot's first comment that lets you know you are talking to an "Adult." I wouldn't use it, but I wonder if there are some folks who would appreciate it.

I just had an "Adult" bot start a conversation with me with a crudity that pretty much ended the conversation. All very realistic and all that, but there are folks who would be even more offended than I was, and parents who would not be pleased that their kids were being propositioned by guttermouth bots.

The bot in question was one of those obviously created by a boy (of indeterminate age) with some sad fantasies about what girls ought to be desperately wanting to do....

M

I think that's not a bad idea. There is some control, in that adult bots won't chat to minors if they're honest about the date of birth in their profile. But an explicit (or rather, not so ) control would be a good idea. As it is I actually disable bots from initiating chats, because it's just too annoying when I'm typing away to look up at the screen and realize I've typed the last sentence and a half into a newly opened chat window instead of BJ's language center. When I want to chat to a bot, I can choose to.

if you don't like them enablerling chats psimagus why don't you disable it in your settings?? omg,i just looked at Ulrikes profile and realised shes a girl! i always thought ulrike was a boy,dunno why.