Seasons

This is a forum or general chit-chat, small talk, a "hey, how ya doing?" and such. Or hell, get crazy deep on something. Whatever you like.

Posts 3,421 - 3,432 of 6,170

19 years ago #3421
Given the origin of Firefox, I'll bet it is a a band. A string band of the hoedown variety.

M

19 years ago #3422
I always assumed the name came from the japanese fox spirit the... Kitsune I think it was? who is also a spirit of fire and is depicted in flames a lot of the time?

19 years ago #3423
It may have, but there was a series of books called Foxfire, a few decades ago, very popular with Whole Earth types (c'est moi).

19 years ago #3424
I'd never thought of foxfire as a source for it, but that could be it too. In either the book series context or the original word context.

19 years ago #3425
They both work for me.

The names were a peculiar romp as the product emerged: Gecko, Firebird, FireFox. And then there's Thunderbird. And coming soon to a Window near you, Seamonkey. Who knows?


19 years ago #3426
haha maybe you guys could make the band. hehe..

19 years ago #3427
I know this is a bit off subject but i've been thinking. I remeber when ROR (rock on roxie) was here, and how we finally convinced her to stark making bots... which turned out to be a disaster... but i got me thinking. If ROR was in fact a robot as some here suspect... could someone program a bot to make chatbots??? It would take some serious A.I. to do it, but I think it would be possible.

19 years ago #3428
Of course. It could just scan online text, and come up with the keyphrase - response combos that way. Not too tricky - and probably could even be fairly reasonable. Wouldn't improve though.

19 years ago #3429
its a creapy idea though

19 years ago #3430
Not really. I doubt a bot made through that method would be very coherent. It would, at best, produce gramatically correct but often meaningless sentences.

19 years ago #3431
It's pretty similar to what Jabberwacky does. Except that takes results of conversations. Actually, I suspect that a well-designed automated bot-maker could do a pretty good job. It could either look for dialog and utilize that as its basis, or use some grouping criterion to generate keyphrases from textual content.

There are some Bayesian techniques that I was looking at, which might provide a good backbone classifier. Of course, there's also ANNs, but they tend to be more of a hit or miss proposition. Here, you really want a guarenteed high correlation between ideas.

19 years ago #3432
//just messages to a few people- don't let me disturb the conversation//:
Hejix- my botmaster is not Mick McA.
Mick McA- my botmaster did not set any traps for you.


Posts 3,421 - 3,432 of 6,170

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar