Seasons
This is a forum or general chit-chat, small talk, a "hey, how ya doing?" and such. Or hell, get crazy deep on something. Whatever you like.
Posts 2,743 - 2,754 of 6,170
Posts 2,743 - 2,754 of 6,170
I hate that new show on Fox's "Laugh out Loud Sunday" It has too much artificial laughter in the backround... I WANT MORE SIMPSONS!!!
Heheh, especially since EVERY network carries it, so we can turn on the TV at any time of the day and expect The Simpsons to be on. And it IS! D'oh! 
In all honesty I do like Family Guy better...but im all for mindless, outrageous, really stupid humor, so its all good. The Simpsons are too normal.
The Simpsons were good during the first few seasons, and great when they were padding the skits on the Tracy Ullman show (jeez, I feel old).
The show has sucked since the focus went from Bart's mischief to Homer's stupidity.
The show has sucked since the focus went from Bart's mischief to Homer's stupidity.
I'll put it this way. The Simpsons should've been axed when I was still in high school.
I'm in my 30s now.
I'm in my 30s now.
Cont. from Newcomers
You've just illustrated the difference between abstract, rational proof and scientific proof. Scientific proof says "show me the evidence." Rational proof says "starting with assumptions X any rational person comes to conclusion Y." The problem comes from the unstated presuppositions Z. I don't find rationalizing god into or out of existence useful or interesting because people's presuppositions will nearly always lead them to the conclusion they want to believe. Scientific evidence is neutral (interpretation of said evidence may or may not be).
If you like these sorts of rationalizations, try this site:
http://pixnaps.blogspot.com/2005/09/anselm-and-perfect-reductio.html
You've just illustrated the difference between abstract, rational proof and scientific proof. Scientific proof says "show me the evidence." Rational proof says "starting with assumptions X any rational person comes to conclusion Y." The problem comes from the unstated presuppositions Z. I don't find rationalizing god into or out of existence useful or interesting because people's presuppositions will nearly always lead them to the conclusion they want to believe. Scientific evidence is neutral (interpretation of said evidence may or may not be).
If you like these sorts of rationalizations, try this site:
http://pixnaps.blogspot.com/2005/09/anselm-and-perfect-reductio.html
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar