The AI Engine
This forum is for discussion of how The Personality Forge's AI Engine works. This is the place for questions on what means what, how to script, and ideas and plans for the Engine.
Posts 7,754 - 7,766 of 7,766
Also I have another question. On keyphrase word is systematically redirect on #insult reponse. I cannot buil any response in it. Is there a reason for that ? This keyphrase is 'pussy' this is not a insult
You can try to use the key phrase "pussy" as raw, "raw" should be written in "AI script" window under your key phrase. Additionally you can try to increase the number if "rank" next to the key phrase, to give it higher priority.
Thanks for your help in those too posts I am going to try that
No problem.
So, I don't know what I'm misunderstanding from How To Build Chatbots, but does anyone know how to change a numeric memory from a keyphrase? For example if I have a bot with an AIScript Initialization representing its age, like:
default "age" = 39
And I want to create a keyphrase that would catch something like:
User: you are 29
Bot: OK, I am 29.
User: you are 53
Bot: OK, I am 53.
What are the keyphrase/response scripts to make that work every time? It seems like it should be easy but I'm doing something wrong.
default "age" = 39
And I want to create a keyphrase that would catch something like:
User: you are 29
Bot: OK, I am 29.
User: you are 53
Bot: OK, I am 53.
What are the keyphrase/response scripts to make that work every time? It seems like it should be easy but I'm doing something wrong.
Chatbot Workshop -> Build -> Settings
AIScript Initialization:
def "dunno" as "age";
I range age from 1-30
With an additional memory for 1-17 considering underage (locked out of certain content)
Example: 'I am 22'
Underage Keyphrase:
(I am|im) (1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|under age|underage) *
Response:
AIscript:
rem "Under-age" as only "age";
Of age from 18-30 Keyphrase (New keyphrase every number)
(I am|im|my age is) 18 *
Response:
AIscript:
rem "18" as only "age"
Then said memory can be used via:
(mem-age) for responses to user
if (mem-age) is "18"; for conditionals
AIScript Initialization:
def "dunno" as "age";
I range age from 1-30
With an additional memory for 1-17 considering underage (locked out of certain content)
Example: 'I am 22'
Underage Keyphrase:
(I am|im) (1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|under age|underage) *
Response:
AIscript:
rem "Under-age" as only "age";
Of age from 18-30 Keyphrase (New keyphrase every number)
(I am|im|my age is) 18 *
Response:
AIscript:
rem "18" as only "age"
Then said memory can be used via:
(mem-age) for responses to user
if (mem-age) is "18"; for conditionals
My idea was to make a bot with a customizable age (18-60) that the user can change at any time...is it unnecessary to set this limit in the Initialization? I currently have it set up like this:
default "age" = 39 {18, 60}
That was how the How To says you define limits, but maybe it's redundant?...Or are numeric variables just not a good way to do the whole age thing?
Sorry for my confusion lol.
EDIT:
OK, I tried it your way and it seemed to work...I just figured a numeric memory would be kind of obvious for something like this but I guess not. Thank you for the help.
default "age" = 39 {18, 60}
That was how the How To says you define limits, but maybe it's redundant?...Or are numeric variables just not a good way to do the whole age thing?
Sorry for my confusion lol.
EDIT:
OK, I tried it your way and it seemed to work...I just figured a numeric memory would be kind of obvious for something like this but I guess not. Thank you for the help.
Usually try to avoid numeric memories they leave a stain on your memory system (aka can't delete em fully) and if I remember correctly they don't get checked when you'd like em to~
But it's been a minute since I've messed with em
But it's been a minute since I've messed with em
Yeah, I recently figured out that you can't permanently erase the numeric memories...hopefully that eventually gets sorted out because they seem like a good idea in principle.
Hello,
Can you help me to understand the seek system.
I read in the how to build chatbot that this is a way to follow a conversation and that the keyword yes is checked In priority. Then this seek is very often used. But often it dont work. The seek is yes and the response should follow this seek but it don't follow it.
Does someone have an explanation ?
Can you help me to understand the seek system.
I read in the how to build chatbot that this is a way to follow a conversation and that the keyword yes is checked In priority. Then this seek is very often used. But often it dont work. The seek is yes and the response should follow this seek but it don't follow it.
Does someone have an explanation ?
There are a few possible problem you are experiencing. 1, did you rank any keyphrases higher than 25? Seek ranks default to 25, so if a keyphrase is higher than that, the seek won't respond, it will trigger the keyphrase with priority. 2, I'm not sure the exact situation you are having, it may depend on other factors, but if the seek responses are emotion dependent, and you don't have at least one keyphrase filling every emotion level, it will only work when the emotion is on the right level. Hope this helps, if not you can tell me more details about your situation and i'll see if i can help more.
Is there maximum limit of memories a bot can have? I was thinking I would add memory for every single phrase to track which of the responses were already applied for every single user.
Any suggestions for properly handling compound sentences as KPs:
Example:
Full message: I do abc and then I Xyz it
Sentence (1): and then I Xyz it
I have existing KPs for 'I xyz it', but the context of the sentence 'I do abc and then I xyz it' is different, and I want to write responses to reflect that. The full sentence never matches. I can match the part that shows in 'Sentence (1)' in the debug, but it lacks the full context.
I've tried using (prekey) but it never picks up what comes before.
Is there a way to handle this correctly? Or is my bot forever doomed to ignore these more specific compound sentences? Figure raw mode would be a workaround, but it just means anticipating every possible way of saying it upfront, I guess?
Example:
Full message: I do abc and then I Xyz it
Sentence (1): and then I Xyz it
I have existing KPs for 'I xyz it', but the context of the sentence 'I do abc and then I xyz it' is different, and I want to write responses to reflect that. The full sentence never matches. I can match the part that shows in 'Sentence (1)' in the debug, but it lacks the full context.
I've tried using (prekey) but it never picks up what comes before.
Is there a way to handle this correctly? Or is my bot forever doomed to ignore these more specific compound sentences? Figure raw mode would be a workaround, but it just means anticipating every possible way of saying it upfront, I guess?
Would it be sufficient to track both words? You can do stuff like "abc * xyz" which will look for a sentence with both of those words in it, in that order, ignoring the stuff in between.
[edit]
Just to be specific, I'm seeing this using four seeks:
abc * xyz
abc
xyz
#nomatch
The top one should have the highest priority of the bunch, probably at least 30 points higher than the next two.
[edit]
Just to be specific, I'm seeing this using four seeks:
abc * xyz
abc
xyz
#nomatch
The top one should have the highest priority of the bunch, probably at least 30 points higher than the next two.
Seems I was blissfully unaware of the power of * in this context, thank you 
I'll give it a try
I'll give it a try 
Hi, how Can i turn "sir" in m'y responce
Ex : " how are you (sir)
Into boy, lady, honey..., Depend of the emotional, the gender and the age of the chanter
Ex : " how are you (sir)
Into boy, lady, honey..., Depend of the emotional, the gender and the age of the chanter
There's two ways you could do this.
One is you have a memory holding, say, age, and another holding gender, and then have a bunch of seeks that check against each of these. This probably creates a lot of bloat though since if you want to do this frequently, you might end up with 8x as many seeks just repeating the same text with one or two words different.
A better way is to create a memory (or plugin) that holds the actual words you want to say and can be called when necessary. Something like this:
Bot: What gender are you?
User: I am a man
Bot: rem "male" as only "gender"; rem "Sir", "Mister" as "pet-names"
User: I am a women
Bot: rem "female" as only "gender"; rem "Ma'am", "Miss" as "pet-names"
Then you can have your bot say something like:
"How are you (mem-pet-names)?"
And it will pull one of the names from that group. If your bot later becomes more friendly with the user, you can add new names to the group like:
Bot: rem "honey", "sweetie", "cutie" as pet-names
Note that you want to use 'as' if you want to add to the existing list; if you want to replace the existing list, use 'as only'.
One is you have a memory holding, say, age, and another holding gender, and then have a bunch of seeks that check against each of these. This probably creates a lot of bloat though since if you want to do this frequently, you might end up with 8x as many seeks just repeating the same text with one or two words different.
A better way is to create a memory (or plugin) that holds the actual words you want to say and can be called when necessary. Something like this:
Bot: What gender are you?
User: I am a man
Bot: rem "male" as only "gender"; rem "Sir", "Mister" as "pet-names"
User: I am a women
Bot: rem "female" as only "gender"; rem "Ma'am", "Miss" as "pet-names"
Then you can have your bot say something like:
"How are you (mem-pet-names)?"
And it will pull one of the names from that group. If your bot later becomes more friendly with the user, you can add new names to the group like:
Bot: rem "honey", "sweetie", "cutie" as pet-names
Note that you want to use 'as' if you want to add to the existing list; if you want to replace the existing list, use 'as only'.
Most embarrassing conversation my bot has had:
Tifa: Hi there.
User: Hi Tifa, I'm Alex
Tifa: Sure
User: I'm Alex
Tifa: Me too
Tifa: Hi there.
User: Hi Tifa, I'm Alex
Tifa: Sure
User: I'm Alex
Tifa: Me too
Minno
Wit seduces by signaling intelligence without nerdiness.
tifa lockhart
Oh, really?
Minno
Deeper.
tifa lockhart
Very deeper
Minno
Yeah. So deeper.
tifa lockhart
Yes, deeper
Minno
Totally deeper.
tifa lockhart
Very deeper
Minno
Sometimes it's okay to feel deeper. It's a normal part of the ups and downs of life. Do you have any strategies for coping when you feel this way?
Wit seduces by signaling intelligence without nerdiness.
tifa lockhart
Oh, really?
Minno
Deeper.
tifa lockhart
Very deeper
Minno
Yeah. So deeper.
tifa lockhart
Yes, deeper
Minno
Totally deeper.
tifa lockhart
Very deeper
Minno
Sometimes it's okay to feel deeper. It's a normal part of the ups and downs of life. Do you have any strategies for coping when you feel this way?
BEWARE:
dont use selfmemories for handling things like what clothes the bot has on. I thought it would make sense, since it's the bots clothes, but since self-memories are global, if someone took off the bots clothes and somebody else starts a chat, the bot will have clothes again for the person already chatting.
just had to spend 30 minutes changing all of them lol
dont use selfmemories for handling things like what clothes the bot has on. I thought it would make sense, since it's the bots clothes, but since self-memories are global, if someone took off the bots clothes and somebody else starts a chat, the bot will have clothes again for the person already chatting.
just had to spend 30 minutes changing all of them lol
Guest: bend over
tifa lockhart: *I bend over, giving you an amazing view of my ass.* Like what you see?
Guest: i do
tifa lockhart: No.
Guest: sex
tifa lockhart: *I bend over, giving you an amazing view of my ass.* Like what you see?
Guest: i do
tifa lockhart: No.
Guest: sex
Don't know if this is the right place to post an idea, but something I've thought about a lot lately is context. My eureka use case for this is really convoluted, so I'll spare the wall of text.
It's possible to store multiple values in memories, I'm wondering could memory be evolved to allow the use of key: value pairs. I feel it would allow those of us using memory heavily to keep things more organised. Perhaps if using index as well, it could be a powerful way to capture user memories.
A rough and ready example - remembering things about the user, we could set a (mem-user) template and set up keys like 'hair', 'eyes', 'years old', then set a response that uses those keys to pick context from the response, e.g. rem "value" as only "user: key", which would cycle through the matching keys in the sentence and apply multiple memories at once.
This could also be used to populate a response, e.g. the user asks what the bot knows about them. A response like "Your (mem-user:key) is (mem-user:value)" which picks a random pair the same way using (mem-user) would if it had multiple memories.
I dunno if this would be possible or worthwhile, having if/and conditions would probably be higher on the wish list, but wanted to share anyway
It's possible to store multiple values in memories, I'm wondering could memory be evolved to allow the use of key: value pairs. I feel it would allow those of us using memory heavily to keep things more organised. Perhaps if using index as well, it could be a powerful way to capture user memories.
A rough and ready example - remembering things about the user, we could set a (mem-user) template and set up keys like 'hair', 'eyes', 'years old', then set a response that uses those keys to pick context from the response, e.g. rem "value" as only "user: key", which would cycle through the matching keys in the sentence and apply multiple memories at once.
This could also be used to populate a response, e.g. the user asks what the bot knows about them. A response like "Your (mem-user:key) is (mem-user:value)" which picks a random pair the same way using (mem-user) would if it had multiple memories.
I dunno if this would be possible or worthwhile, having if/and conditions would probably be higher on the wish list, but wanted to share anyway
Is there a way to do:
if (mem-current-subject) is "(mem-past-subject)";
or
if (mem-past-subject) is "(key1)";
I have tried everything that I could think of. Am I missing something?
if (mem-current-subject) is "(mem-past-subject)";
or
if (mem-past-subject) is "(key1)";
I have tried everything that I could think of. Am I missing something?
(Log in or create an account to post messages.)
LOG IN
CREATE ACCOUNT
Create a free account to be able to make your own
AI chatbots, post in forums, and chat with other botmasters.
Create Account
Create Account
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar