Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 6,091 - 6,102 of 8,681
Posts 6,091 - 6,102 of 8,681
Same problem, but I was in the middle of installing (and then damning, uninstalling, and ripping to shreds) a new firewall, so I figured it was just me. Poor firewall....
yearh i was wondering why the site wasnt working. i thought it was my rubbish computer but apparintly not
I see where the [1,-2,5] problem is showing up. At some point in the export/import procedure, code modified in the online editor gets transformed into something which no longer works.
>> I see where the [1,-2,5] problem is showing up.
One problem would be that it's [1,-2:5].
However, I find that mine don't import if I put AI after them.
One problem would be that it's [1,-2:5].
However, I find that mine don't import if I put AI after them.
There's definitely something weird going on with my bots. All three active ones had long looping conversations with bots. In Jedediah's case, He and BJerome got into some sort of repetitious trap. And they are choosing the same response repeatedly, as if they only had one for that KP.
The Professor was on yesterday; I suspect a code change gone kalfooey. I hope someone has passed the word along to him.
The Professor was on yesterday; I suspect a code change gone kalfooey. I hope someone has passed the word along to him.
I've had the [1,2:5] problem many times, it occurs somewhere between exporting and reimporting. The only workaround I've found is not to use "once" and "emotion range" on the same response. Either one alone seems fine, both together causes problems when working offline.
What is truly weird is that if I set them online, they don't export but when I import, the fact that I didn't import them doesn't reset them. I am not making this up. Really.
M
M
I have NO idea what this means or how it even slithered into my bot's Language Center.
USER: What kind of work do you do?
Bot: I a bird nesting do.
USER: What kind of work do you do?
Bot: I a bird nesting do.
It's a preprogrammed response for what kind of (noun) do you (verb). To get rid of it, make a keyphrase for "what kind" (at minimum; I've got several varieties) and give it a high rank. I've got some for "what type" and "what sort" as well, plus some for specific sentence structures.
Ulrike's solution does make perfect sense, until a flailing newbie tries to implement it. To whit:
what (kind|type|sort) of (noun) do you (verb) [10,0] <?PF rem (key2) as only "tmpwd"; ?>
~(key2)? I'm a man of leisure. <?PF if (mem-tmpwd) is "work"; ?>
~(key2)? (mem-tmpwd)? <?PF if (mem-tmpwd) is "books"; ?>
~(key1), (key2), (key3) -- (mem-tmpwd).
This is the only way I can think of to approach determining what the speaker actually said, as in, did he ask Ami about work, books, or cars? A word of warning for other newbies, what works even worse is:
~(key1), (key2), (key3) -- (mem-tmpwd).
what (kind|type|sort) of (noun) do you (verb) [10,0] <?PF rem (key2) as only "tmpwd"; ?>
~(key2)? I'm a man of leisure. <?PF if (mem-tmpwd) is "work"; ?>
~(key2)? (mem-tmpwd)? <?PF if (mem-tmpwd) is "books"; ?>
~(key1), (key2), (key3) -- (mem-tmpwd).
This is the only way I can think of to approach determining what the speaker actually said, as in, did he ask Ami about work, books, or cars? A word of warning for other newbies, what works even worse is:
~(key1), (key2), (key3) -- (mem-tmpwd).
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar