The AI Engine
This forum is for discussion of how The Personality Forge's AI Engine works. This is the place for questions on what means what, how to script, and ideas and plans for the Engine.
Posts 5,949 - 5,960 of 7,766
Posts 5,949 - 5,960 of 7,766
ezzer
17 years ago
17 years ago
Thanks, ladies. Could it maybe be a problem with combo script? Some of mine have, for ex:
<?PF chrono: week(M); rem "blah" as "blablah"; ?>
I mean, that SHOULDN'T be a problem as far as I know, but I'm having Monday responses pop up any old day...and my script looks just like that...
<?PF chrono: week(M); rem "blah" as "blablah"; ?>
I mean, that SHOULDN'T be a problem as far as I know, but I'm having Monday responses pop up any old day...and my script looks just like that...
Ulrike
17 years ago
17 years ago
When I need two AI Scripts in the same response, I tend to put them in separate brackets. Mainly because it kept telling me there was an error in my formatting otherwise... But you could try that. *shrugs*
ezzer
17 years ago
17 years ago
Hmmm...Never thought of that. It's so weird though, because I have lots of script strings in one set of brackets, formatted exactly as above, that work just fine...maybe it's something to do with with chrono statements. Anyway, I'll give that a try. Thanks again, Ulrike.
Rykxx
17 years ago
17 years ago
I've had a few problems with this too but I've found that if you put the chrono at the end of the statement it works. ie:
<?PF express:amused; chrono: week(SU); ?>
<?PF express:amused; chrono: week(SU); ?>
ezzer
17 years ago
17 years ago
YAY! (still a pain to go back and change each and every one of those, but)
Woot! That works.
Ty, Rykxx
Woot! That works.
Ty, Rykxx
The Clerk
17 years ago
17 years ago
Technical question, so I can move on to responsiveness in my bots -- can you have a list of plug ins in which a plug in has a comma in it (Ain't you missin' me, Bobby McGee), and, if so, how, please?
Thanks.
Thanks.
The Clerk
17 years ago
17 years ago
Never mind.
The surest way for me to find out stuff on my own is to post it. I think I got it now. Raw mode.

The Clerk
17 years ago
17 years ago
All right, dumb question. But consider that I have been foisting dumb bots on botland, and I'm trying to remedy that.
Why does this response yield itself verbatim:
Well, Boswell has the (adjnoun)s again.
I thought it should go:
Well, Boswell has the poisoned frogs again, or something in that vein.
Apologies all around for my bots, and thanks for the chats.
Why does this response yield itself verbatim:
Well, Boswell has the (adjnoun)s again.
I thought it should go:
Well, Boswell has the poisoned frogs again, or something in that vein.
Apologies all around for my bots, and thanks for the chats.
Ulrike
17 years ago
17 years ago
I think you'd want to use (adj) (noun)s in that case. You might be better off with (adj) (object)s, because there are some rather odd nouns in the (noun) plug-in.
(adjnoun) picks up a combination of adjectives and nouns in a keyphrase, but doesn't do anything at all in a response.
(adjnoun) picks up a combination of adjectives and nouns in a keyphrase, but doesn't do anything at all in a response.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar