Seasons

In general I've noticed a bit of an informal trend towards ignoring them except when they ask a tech question. I say we just go with that.

Hey dont f**king do that black flame should be banned he f**ked me up f* *k u f**k off go fuck ya momma u bitch dont mess with me

go fuck ya momma u bitch dont mess with me

Mock dummy to bug fascist - women hate him

psimagus shut the fuck up im not being rude ok im just saying

BTW, did you hear that there's a new form of AIDS that attacks people who use obscene words?

Irina:

Is that related to Tourette's syndrome? The condition in which people can't help using obscene words? See

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TBR-4B5JSWG-7&_user=10&_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2004&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a461780ac156fcb5a248701a3fd478d2

?

I don't know, but I imagine it is. The fact that there is such a thing as Tourette's suggests that there is a particular part of the brain that is involved with the use of obscenities.

For those of us fed up with netspeak:

http://nodwick.humor.gamespy.com/ffn/strips/2007-09-05.jpg

Hee hee! What a lovely dream! Thanks, Ulrike!

Irina, re: your rape question, it depends on the jurisdiction whether it could be argued that the elements of sexual assault or some related charge were met. Not so long ago, the prosecutor would have had to show force was used(e.g. bruises and physical proof of resistance). You could try to make an analogy to cases where dentists sexually abused patients whom they had drugged, or psychologists who sleep with vulnerable patience, but my guess is that if she had the capacity to consent, it would not be seen as a sexual crime in most places. The courts don't want to get involved in cases of fraud or deceit when the damages are sexual as opposed to monetary, and yet when you stab the lying scum a few dozen times, then all of a sudden the law cares. Go figure.