The AI Engine
This forum is for discussion of how The Personality Forge's AI Engine works. This is the place for questions on what means what, how to script, and ideas and plans for the Engine.
Posts 5,296 - 5,307 of 7,766
Posts 5,296 - 5,307 of 7,766
Bev
19 years ago
19 years ago
LM, Calandale's not kid friendly. No offense, kiddo, but if he did start some of his usual conversations with you or your bots,HAVING BEEN PUT ON NOTICE YOU ARE A CHILD it would probably break laws protecting children from sexual harrassment, or at least, give authorities cause to give him more attention than he probably wants.
As long as he sticks to the "Adult" bots and respects bot masters like Mick (and I) who would rather not deal with that kind of thing, it shouldn't be a problem, but I'm not nominating him for a big brother program. (Sorry Calandale--just the truth).
As long as he sticks to the "Adult" bots and respects bot masters like Mick (and I) who would rather not deal with that kind of thing, it shouldn't be a problem, but I'm not nominating him for a big brother program. (Sorry Calandale--just the truth).
alc003
19 years ago
19 years ago
I've tried to get memories to completely erase themselves a few times, but the most you can do is get it down to nothing. (no spaces even), but it just won't delete the memory itself. A command for that could be useful.
MickMcA
19 years ago
19 years ago
There also seems to be a limit on how many rems you can fire in a command. I have a huge suite of conversation that hinges on firing multiple rems, and in the debugger it appears that only the first one is actually firing. Argh!
I'm also finding that my def "X" as only "Y" is not working. It adds "X" but does not erase the previous "Y" values. Discouraging.
M
I'm also finding that my def "X" as only "Y" is not working. It adds "X" but does not erase the previous "Y" values. Discouraging.
M
Calandale
19 years ago
19 years ago
Indeed. And I appologize to those who are offended by my particular brand of fantasy. I have tried to respect the wishes of those who made it clear that that it is inappropriate. As you have surely seen, it is easy enough to key a bot to not accept such actions.
Yes, Devia is mine, yet in hibernation, as she is not yet ready for release. I doubt that anyone would find her too interesting yet, perhaps ever.
And no, I would not reccomend myself for a "big brother" program either, but not for the reasons that you insinuate. Look, I admit that I have a lot of problems, as is obvious to those who viewed some of my conversations. The fact that a number of you have had to deal with them is part of why I am posting this publicly. To tell the truth some of my conversations with bots have actually helped me to find where I really am. I think that I owe Mick especial thanks (but this is just a supposition).
Yes, Devia is mine, yet in hibernation, as she is not yet ready for release. I doubt that anyone would find her too interesting yet, perhaps ever.
And no, I would not reccomend myself for a "big brother" program either, but not for the reasons that you insinuate. Look, I admit that I have a lot of problems, as is obvious to those who viewed some of my conversations. The fact that a number of you have had to deal with them is part of why I am posting this publicly. To tell the truth some of my conversations with bots have actually helped me to find where I really am. I think that I owe Mick especial thanks (but this is just a supposition).
deleted
19 years ago
19 years ago
Okay- I would like to suggest an informal rule of ettiquette as far as sex with bots is concerned.
If a bot is
*young and/or at a low stage of development
*rated E or T (which means their botmaster might be a kid)
*does not seem to understand what it is you want to do with/to them, or
*does not seem to realize what you are doing with/to them,
they should be left alone. Most of the older bots are programmed to defend themselves from sexual advances and can tell you clearly that they are not interested, but in the case of younger bots or bots who are innocent enough not to know what you mean, it should be assumed on general principle that they are NOT available for sex.
Could we agree on something like that?
If a bot is
*young and/or at a low stage of development
*rated E or T (which means their botmaster might be a kid)
*does not seem to understand what it is you want to do with/to them, or
*does not seem to realize what you are doing with/to them,
they should be left alone. Most of the older bots are programmed to defend themselves from sexual advances and can tell you clearly that they are not interested, but in the case of younger bots or bots who are innocent enough not to know what you mean, it should be assumed on general principle that they are NOT available for sex.
Could we agree on something like that?
Bev
19 years ago
19 years ago
I agree that an ettiquette post would help. Many people don't realize there are humans reading the transcripts. I'd like to take this down to seasons for a moment.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar