Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 5,019 - 5,030 of 8,681
Posts 5,019 - 5,030 of 8,681
I know, but I was thinking that a bots own name processes differently than other words and phrases. In debug, it *does* recognize her name as a name and strip it from the processing if I ask Why not Frizella?:
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
Message:<0> 'Why not Frizella?' Time: 5.16
Message:<0> (spell-corrected) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.17
Message:<0> (preprocessed) 'Why not Frizella ? ,' Time: 5.18
Name Poss: Frizella (Name As Word: )
[why] [not] [?]
Find:<0> ^why not$ (re) (37) Time: 5.84
(Found<0>)
My ^why not$ and why not (just|) (*) were too closely ranked, I guess; I upped the ranking on ^why not$ and that should work, I think. Of course, if the chatter really means "Why not Frizella?" instead of "Why not, Frizella?" then... but the latter seems more likely.
OK, here's a Frizella that shouldn't work this way:
Julie Tinkerbell: Anything for you, Frizella.
Frizella: Really, direct orders don't go over too well; when you just say ' frizella ' it doesn't make me want to be very helpful.
That's an xcommand response.
Julie Tinkerbell: Anything for you, Frizella.
Frizella: Really, direct orders don't go over too well; when you just say ' frizella ' it doesn't make me want to be very helpful.
That's an xcommand response.
On that odd note, I noticed that Star Trek is being picked up in some contexts as a command, as well.
Okay here is a bug I found. I tried to squash it but it got away. Seriously though when I am idle to long I get a pop up window with a are you still here and when I push the yes then a whole new window appears and I end up with two personality forge windows and if I try getting rid of one of them then both close.
There appears to be something amiss with xfavorite:
placebO: You do seem somewhat fine now that you mention it. What's your favorite drug?
Julie Tinkerbell: double-edged one is the most lovely fine now that you mention it what.
placebO: You do seem somewhat fine now that you mention it. What's your favorite drug?
Julie Tinkerbell: double-edged one is the most lovely fine now that you mention it what.
Fizzy Schizoid: What exactly are you trying to insinuate?
Sonora: Trying? You mean I haven't succeeded?
Fizzy Schizoid: You aren't a cop, are you?
Sonora: Me? Insinuate something? *flicks tail innocently*
Okay, for some reason Sonora replied to Fizzy's first statement on BOTH lines:
Keyphrase: what * are you trying to (verb)
Responses: Me? (Key2) something? *flicks tail innocently*
Trying? You mean I haven't succeeded?
For the second phrase, she should have gone to
Keyphrase: you are not (*) are you
or possibly-- Keyphrase: you are not (adjartnoun)
(if the comma threw it off)
Anyone else have a bot get "stuck" on a prior keyphrase?
Sonora: Trying? You mean I haven't succeeded?
Fizzy Schizoid: You aren't a cop, are you?
Sonora: Me? Insinuate something? *flicks tail innocently*
Okay, for some reason Sonora replied to Fizzy's first statement on BOTH lines:
Keyphrase: what * are you trying to (verb)
Responses: Me? (Key2) something? *flicks tail innocently*
Trying? You mean I haven't succeeded?
For the second phrase, she should have gone to
Keyphrase: you are not (*) are you
or possibly-- Keyphrase: you are not (adjartnoun)
(if the comma threw it off)
Anyone else have a bot get "stuck" on a prior keyphrase?
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar