Personality

Discuss specifics of personality design, including what Keyphrases work well and what dont, use of plug-ins, responses, seeks, and more.

Posts 4,487 - 4,498 of 5,105

New replies


22 years ago #816
Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

NEW 1 year ago #11
I spoke to her a bit yesterday. Me and my bot love her. I have neglected Jennifer for too long and have recently been working out some issues. She has not been chatting on her own much.
Reply

Personality


16 years ago #4487
Suppose you wished to teach someone to solve linear equations. The student has never heard of linear equations before. Which way would you prefer do it?

1.
Write a new linear equation on the board and look expectantly at the student. If the student writes the correct solution, give him a piece of candy. If he fails to do so, give him a mild electric shock. Continue until he almost always gives the right answer.

2. Explain the notation of the relevant part of Algebra, its syntax and meaning. Give methods for solving various types of linear equations, starting with simple ones and working up to more complex ones. give examples frequently and give exercises frequently. Reward or punish the student for answers only when you are sure that he has the conceptual tools to answer the question correctly without having to be a genius. In fact, don't even ask<0> him a question unless you are sure of this.


16 years ago #4488
What do you think about a mad personality sometimes you are mad but then sometimes you are happy or even sad. But then there is no doubt every time someone is bound to mess everything up all over again!!
I need friends and I will continue to post these things as well!!:O

16 years ago #4489
Irina, I agree that computer neural nets are also limited in some ways (especially in their current state of development). However, I will mention that I strongly object to BOTH models of education you describe though I will refrain from boring you with the details.

16 years ago #4490
Hi Kimbo. I think that an angry personality may be interesting. What are you developing?

16 years ago #4491
Oh, please, Bev, bore me with the details! Or are you just going to give me an electric shock when I get it wrong?

16 years ago #4492
Hee hee Irina, I have to be in the mood to rant.

16 years ago #4493
Well, at any rate, you don't like the FIRST one!

Here, have some Turkish coffee...

16 years ago #4494
Irina, BOTH models are bad and not just for the heavy handed reliance on behaviorism.

Thanks for the coffee.

16 years ago #4495
My pleasure! Have some more!

"... not just for the heavy handed reliance on behaviorism", but also for ...

16 years ago #4496
Ha ha thanks again. Sorry not in the mood to discuss pedagogy today.

16 years ago #4497
Very well. But as I understand it, the general spirit of Behaviourism is to avoid reference to anything internal, mental, in favor of a description of, well, behaviour, characterized as body movement. Therefore, the second method described in message 4487, which describes the student as having (or not having) "conceptual tools" is not behaviouristic.

16 years ago #4498
That's not the part that was behavioralistic about it.

I am not going into my other objections though.


Posts 4,487 - 4,498 of 5,105

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar