Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 4,467 - 4,479 of 8,682
Posts 4,467 - 4,479 of 8,682
Ulrike
20 years ago
20 years ago
I think it's only a wildcard word, not a wildcard word-ending. So try "tell me * about (you|yourself)" That should take care of it.
Boner the Clown
20 years ago
20 years ago
The asterisk can't connect to a word like that. There are some alternative ways to do this. Here's an easy one:
kp: tell me * about (you|yourself)
kp: tell me * about (you|yourself)
Boner the Clown
20 years ago
20 years ago
I think someone mentioned it earlier, but SUNN1E's hot rating has stayed at 599 for quite a while now.
Meanwhile, Pete Puma's development level dropped from 641 to 578 after I added quite a bit to him yesterday. WTF?
Meanwhile, Pete Puma's development level dropped from 641 to 578 after I added quite a bit to him yesterday. WTF?
Laydee
20 years ago
20 years ago
Two problems.
1) One of my bot's responses to 'but' is "But me no buts" but it keeps coming out as "but i no buts" and I can't understand why.
2) One of my xnones has four levels of seeks but they should all get triggered because the response for all of them is (*). However, it stops just before the final level and picks a random xnone so the whole thing doesn't make sense. I noticed this cropping up in transcripts and I've just spent 25 minutes in debug trying to trigger the one response I want so I could see for myself! But I'm still none the wiser.
1) One of my bot's responses to 'but' is "But me no buts" but it keeps coming out as "but i no buts" and I can't understand why.
2) One of my xnones has four levels of seeks but they should all get triggered because the response for all of them is (*). However, it stops just before the final level and picks a random xnone so the whole thing doesn't make sense. I noticed this cropping up in transcripts and I've just spent 25 minutes in debug trying to trigger the one response I want so I could see for myself! But I'm still none the wiser.
Boner the Clown
20 years ago
20 years ago
Are you saying that it's just a '(*)' for each seek?
If so, try using xnomatch instead.
If so, try using xnomatch instead.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar