Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 4,218 - 4,233 of 8,681
Posts 4,218 - 4,233 of 8,681
I think that the ability to seperate convos are going to be an option for users with a FoF account. But that is coming still.
Something seems to be wrong with the way keyphrases are given their "bonus" these days ... Someone asked Simulo "Do you like Shakespeare?"
Debug says that sentence catches
"Shakespeare" (which is ranked 20) with a score of 34
and "do you like (*)" (which is ranked 6) with a score of 35
Obviously, I can change the rankings a little to make that work, but it seems like the other phrase doesn't deserve all of the bonuns it's getting ... and judging from the way debug looks, it's like the phrase "do you like (*)" is starting with a value of 24 and not 6.
This is a small thing, Prof, but I thought you'd want to know about it.
Debug says that sentence catches
"Shakespeare" (which is ranked 20) with a score of 34
and "do you like (*)" (which is ranked 6) with a score of 35
Obviously, I can change the rankings a little to make that work, but it seems like the other phrase doesn't deserve all of the bonuns it's getting ... and judging from the way debug looks, it's like the phrase "do you like (*)" is starting with a value of 24 and not 6.
This is a small thing, Prof, but I thought you'd want to know about it.
And I'm saying: the general "do you like" keyphrase is only marked 6, and the specific one is marked 20. The difference in those ranks is getting overridden by something in the processing.
Frizella had the following exchange:
bot: No? Why not?
Frizella: Why not, indeed. Although if I just because you ask me to, I'll have to for everyone else, too, and that could get tiring.
The keyphrase for this response is:
why not (just|) (*) <0>
Debug shows:
Find: why not (just|) (*) (49) Time: 1.10
(Found)
Bonus Score: 12 (12 / (0+1))
Sentence Score: 0
Yes!... (Rank: 61)
Highest!
Key: ' why. not.r . ,SoftWildCard,.' PostKeySpan: '-1'
TempSpan IS . Looking for 'SoftWildCard' Match#1
TempSpan IS 3. Looking for '.' Match#2
Total Time: 1.11
AIScript in Responses
Total Time Pre-Chrono: 1.11 RESULTS: '4'
Trying: Why not, indeed. Although if I (key2) just because you ask me to, I'll have to (key2) for everyone else, too, and that could get tiring. (random: 0)
<0>
I'm curious why "why not" is matching on a keyphrase with a hard (*) that doesn't exist in the other bot's phrase.
bot: No? Why not?
Frizella: Why not, indeed. Although if I just because you ask me to, I'll have to for everyone else, too, and that could get tiring.
The keyphrase for this response is:
why not (just|) (*) <0>
Debug shows:
Find: why not (just|) (*) (49) Time: 1.10
(Found)
Bonus Score: 12 (12 / (0+1))
Sentence Score: 0
Yes!... (Rank: 61)
Highest!
Key: ' why. not.r . ,SoftWildCard,.' PostKeySpan: '-1'
TempSpan IS . Looking for 'SoftWildCard' Match#1
TempSpan IS 3. Looking for '.' Match#2
Total Time: 1.11
AIScript in Responses
Total Time Pre-Chrono: 1.11 RESULTS: '4'
Trying: Why not, indeed. Although if I (key2) just because you ask me to, I'll have to (key2) for everyone else, too, and that could get tiring. (random: 0)
<0>
I'm curious why "why not" is matching on a keyphrase with a hard (*) that doesn't exist in the other bot's phrase.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar