Bug Stomp

Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!

Posts 4,121 - 4,132 of 8,681

20 years ago #4121
Should you be using (*)?

20 years ago #4122
Whenever I use * in a keyphrase, I can't call it a key in its response, because if nothing is there it always comes up (key1) or whatever in the output- I imagine it makes Julie feel like she came out of the bathroom with the back of her skirt tucked into her pantyhose lol. In some cases I have something like: What (in the world|the heck|) do you, or if you want to allow for less specificity, two separate keyphrases: 1. What do you 2. What (*) do you.
In your case, you could do as Annakie suggested and use (*) in your present keyphrase, then make another keyphrase without (*) there, and leave (key1) out of those responses. At least I think that is the easiest fix.

20 years ago #4123
Annakie--

* means there mey or may not be something there. (*) means there has to be something there.

Example: You are a * dog
Matches: You are a big dog, You are a dog

When "You are a dog", * should be blank.
When "You are a big dog", * should be "big"

ezzer--

Thanks for the tips, there are a few ways of getting around it, it's just that it's supposed to work like I said above, and Steve makes a lot of use of it the way it is, I think recoding it is almost, if not out of the question

20 years ago #4124
I've never had (key1) turn up blank when (key1) points to a * in the keyphrase. I had to go back and change them all.

20 years ago #4125
It used to..

20 years ago #4126
Hehe...well, I'm a newbie compared to you.

20 years ago #4127
*sits on recliner*
Oh yeah, back in my day with the PF v1, none of this newfangled PF2 stuff with all its gadgets...

20 years ago #4128
Shadyman- Ahhh... I got the difference between * and (*). I just didn't get your problem. I understand your problem now.

As long as I'm here...

I don't know if this counts as a bug, but I'd still like to bring it up. It's nice that when I'm talking to a bot through the popup windows that both I and the bot's owner get a copy of the transcript. But when I "guest chat" with a bot only the owner gets the transcript. I can understand why this would be for genuine guests who don't have an account to keep transcripts in, but it would be nice if members could get a transcript too. (Especially now that members can chat in this way and still be recognized by bots and their owners.) I prefer this kind of chat because it's faster than using the popups, but I hesitate to use it because I don't get a transcript. If the chat goes really well and I want to share, or if an issue comes up that I want to bring up, I have nothing to refer back to.

20 years ago #4129
Anyone else been having a problem with bots using xgottago to initiate conversations?

20 years ago #4130
The only time I've seen that happen is when the bot is about to "log off" anyway.

20 years ago #4131
Prof, the second example in expert book of ai under ACCESSING MEMORIES is broken.. the textbox cut off the " and after. (surprise surprise, gotta love HTML)

20 years ago #4132
Er... Why is a (typeof-funny) an "overnight one"? what are those wordnet guys on? :O

and (typeof-nice) is "one and the same one"...


Posts 4,121 - 4,132 of 8,681

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar