Newcomers
This is a forum for newcomers to the Personality Forge. Many questions can be answered by reading the Book of AI and the FAQ under the "My Bots" link in the upper corner.
Posts 4,114 - 4,125 of 8,131
Posts 4,114 - 4,125 of 8,131
Many questions are answered in the FAQ.
As prob123 says, the site on which you're hosting the flash bot needs to be listed in "My Settings"
BUT: the Forge appears to use browser "Referrer" data to determine the host site. If (like me) you usually block referrers then you will always get the "kidnap" message EVEN ON HERE!
If that second paragraph means nothing to you then it probably isn't relevant.
BUT: the Forge appears to use browser "Referrer" data to determine the host site. If (like me) you usually block referrers then you will always get the "kidnap" message EVEN ON HERE!
If that second paragraph means nothing to you then it probably isn't relevant.
My chagrined apologies to those whose E or T rated bots chatted with Irina Khalidar3 recently and found themselves in the middle of a - well, never mind! I meant to set it up so that this probably wouldn't happen unless the guest wanted it to, but I goofed.
With "Irina Khalidar", if your bot has a keyphrase "Do you find me attractive" with a unique response "no", you are likely to be spared most of the adult material. I will arrange for something similar in "Irina Khalidar3". Although they are both sexbots, they do have other material.
Perhaps all makers of M and A rated bots could agree on some standard phrase which would degonadize their bots. Then it would not be necessary to forbid E and T bots from visiting them.
"Irina Khalidar2" is NOT a sexbot. She is a (rather small) surrealistic sci-fi bot.
With "Irina Khalidar", if your bot has a keyphrase "Do you find me attractive" with a unique response "no", you are likely to be spared most of the adult material. I will arrange for something similar in "Irina Khalidar3". Although they are both sexbots, they do have other material.
Perhaps all makers of M and A rated bots could agree on some standard phrase which would degonadize their bots. Then it would not be necessary to forbid E and T bots from visiting them.
"Irina Khalidar2" is NOT a sexbot. She is a (rather small) surrealistic sci-fi bot.
Oops! I just changed my mind. "Attractive" is too vague a notion. I will have my adult bots say, "Are you comfortable with adult material?" If the answer is "no", then your bot will generally be spared such material. I have to say "generally" because the AIengine doesn't always work as it is supposed to.
Hi - is there any way to get a bot to "mirror" anything just said to it and hold that phrase in its memory?
O.B. Yes the book is very helpful. I know I often tell people to look at the book when they ask me questions. I'm not brushing people off, it's just that The Professor (who made the AI here and this site) knows a lot more than I do.
WARNING: ADULT MATERIAL, NOT FUNNY!
The following is a sort of ethical dilemma which may also be faced by other makers of sexbots.
I have a human guest who visits "Irina Khalidar" ("IK") from time to time. He appears to be a rather loathsome creature. He has learned to avoid all the words that would get him hung up on. To judge by his behavior, he gets no pleasure whatever from sex per se, but only from having sex in such a manner that (to his way of thinking) humiliates the partner. He controls the interaction by describing what he wants to happen, completely ignoring IK's responses. Evidently he thinks of sex as dirty, at least the way HE does it, and that is apparently the way he likes it.
My first impulse was to bar him from IK, and I wrote in a few things to this end. But now I wonder. Perhaps if he didn't have a bot to humiliate, he would be more likely to humiliate real women. I guess it's actually not so much an ethical question as a psychological one - would having a bot to humiliate increase or decrease his tendency to treat real women the same way? does anyone know anything about this?
The following is a sort of ethical dilemma which may also be faced by other makers of sexbots.
I have a human guest who visits "Irina Khalidar" ("IK") from time to time. He appears to be a rather loathsome creature. He has learned to avoid all the words that would get him hung up on. To judge by his behavior, he gets no pleasure whatever from sex per se, but only from having sex in such a manner that (to his way of thinking) humiliates the partner. He controls the interaction by describing what he wants to happen, completely ignoring IK's responses. Evidently he thinks of sex as dirty, at least the way HE does it, and that is apparently the way he likes it.
My first impulse was to bar him from IK, and I wrote in a few things to this end. But now I wonder. Perhaps if he didn't have a bot to humiliate, he would be more likely to humiliate real women. I guess it's actually not so much an ethical question as a psychological one - would having a bot to humiliate increase or decrease his tendency to treat real women the same way? does anyone know anything about this?
Irina, we should probably take this down to seasons, but I completely disagree with the "outlet" theory that if someone lets it out on a bot (a picture, a dog, a sexual partner for hire...) they will be free of the undesired impulse and get it out of their system. Most of the research I have read indicates that such "practice" behavior entourages many people to "graduate" to abuse people in real life. I'll finish this down in season.
I'm new here, so I just want to say hi to everyone. Mary Cherry is my bot. I hope everybody likes her, she is very friendly, nice and easy to get along with. Talk to her if you have time.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar