Personality

Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.

What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.

btc: a quick question if you dont mind in the case of using for example KP:
^are you (really|) (kidding|joking|et al)
if the conditional "(really|)" were to be a list like "(truly|honestly|really|)" would

...I wonder why that cut off?
ahem

-the above be the right structure or "(truly||honestly||really|)"? Ive used the pipe symbol in responses but not KPs- i assume they must work differently

response pipe things came from the keyphrase pipe things. They work the same

okay- so then are multiple pipes ignored in KPs? I believe that in responses they denote a % chance of occurance (Blah|)= 50% (Blah||)= 25% or something like that.

Sorry to be a post-pest but can

grrrrrr.....

Can the "pf if gender" phrase be used within elipses so that a single response can cover both male and female possibilities or must it be done w/2 responses?

Whom are you trying to rule out?

Hermaphrodites, presumably.

no you misunderstand, I mean say something like

"Hows it going" pf if male "man|dude|guy" pf if female "Sistah|Grrl"

i know thats not proper form but it seems that i get my message cut off when i use proper form (?) So anyway, is it possible to write a single statement that does that or does one need to KPs?

I don't think so. That sort of within-the-sentence branching is too much to expect from the system we're using here. It'd be easier just to write two different responses (possibly responses to the same keyphrase) that were followed by AI Script in each case.

Adding this kind distinction to a keyphrase doesn’t make much sense. It is better to put those if statements in your responses. But I suppose that with KP, you mean responses not keyphrases.

You need two responses here, as AIScript always relates to the whole response:
How’s it going, (man|dude|guy)? <?PF if male; ?>
How’s it going, (sister|girl)? <?PF if female; ?>

I don't know what AI will make of "Sisah" and "Grrl", but if you were talking to me I would prefer if you speak properly