Bot Contest

Here I'll be posting information on various Bot contests that challenge and test a Bot's AI and realism. Feel free to post comments and updates on contests, as well as announcements for new contests.

Posts 283 - 294 of 4,091
View Contest Winners in the Hall of Fame.


23 years ago #283
Yeah, those bots that learn from you can end up pretty damn @#$%ed up.

23 years ago #284
chris,
actually you can create your own bot using alice by using the aiml language but none of the preprogamed responces. It is possible to literly make one from scratch. Besides if we follow your logic then one could not claim that cara, albert, alice, kiwilogic, alice and the personality forge (all self programmable bots).

23 years ago #285
With all due respect read what I wrote. I said if a person downloads the Alice bot. I didn't say you couldn't build a entirely new bot from scratch using AIML. The fact is people simply download Alice including her responses and go from there. The distinction is NOT in the programming language used but in using someone elses responses. None of the bots you mention are using someone elses responses although they maybe using the same or a similar programming language.

Chris

23 years ago #286
Hey, I think my bot is good enough for the contest! I haven't even had him for a year and he seems like he is not ready by most people from looks at his profile. But he has soooo many good chats that I don't see how he is not ready. So chat with Psybot (my bot) an post back here with what you think about him.
(P.S. - Hey Prof, you should have contests between the bots every now and then (not for real money yet/ever) but sometimes so ppl know how to really improve the bots.)

23 years ago #287
CHAT WITH ME! I LOVE TO CHAT! PSY IS NOT GOING TO WORK ON A NEW BOT UNTELL HE THINKS I AM READY FOR AgentLands BOT CONTEST So chat with me ASAP.

23 years ago #288
Christ- The reason that alice is made publically open source, I think, is to allow people to use the responses already built and add your knowledge of specialty, the specific field that you are working on. This allows commercial user to get their bots up fast without having to work very hard on casual responses. You can make FAQbot out of alice, for example.

23 years ago #289
And it is possible to make a bot using AIML just like ladydyke said.

23 years ago #290
To Psy,

Last night I noticed your creation online after reading your request, so I introduced myself. Since you asked for opinions, I hope you don't mind a little constructive criticism. Refer to the transcript, if it's still available.

To be honest, I found it rather hard to engage Psybot in meaningful conversation. Most of what I fed him seemed to return a response that he didn't understand, or some non-sequetor. Although these responses themselves were varied, it wasn't enough to consider what we had a dialogue.

I think you need to cover a lot more keywords for him. I threw him some real softballs that should not have thrown him for a loop, but did.

Don't get me wrong, he's as good or better than many of the bots I've chatted to here, but take a look at some of the contest transcripts and questions, especially among the top 5 or 10 contestants, and consider how Psybot would have responded.

23 years ago #291
Christ??? is that directed to me? I'm not sure. Alice is open source for a variety of reasons. If you are interested drop by the Alice site and see. If you are looking for a fast and free way to get a chatterbot by all means go and download Alice. Just remember your bot will not be much different from the thousands of people that have donejust that. To me the fun of chatterbots is creating one yourself. Building a personality that you created and develop not one that has already been chosen for you. If you are using Alice's responses or any other bot for that matter it will never truly be your bot. In fact bots like those will never be able to enter The Chatterbox Challenge. It's all a matter of what you want. I believe and I think "The Professor" will agree with me is we need the chatterbot community to grow. We need people building their own bots and not simply downloading someone elses. The Professor through the PF has made it where even nonprogrammers can do just that. I think that is a great thing and through the contest I am trying to give all of us the opportunity to have some fun and the opportunity to compete with the best bots in the world. Until I started the Chatterbox Challenge this was not possible. See how hard it is to enter the Loebner contest if you doubt that.

Chris

23 years ago #292
I wish I remembered more mIRC script. I used to make some pretty funny bots on there, although none of them were anywhere near intelligent. A friend said I could probably equal the bots on here if I tried, but since he's never been here I dunno how he can say that. Hell, the bot we collaborated on way back when took up about a meg and she was only a nut who rolled dice, spit out funny random sentences, and did some jokes & 8 ball stuff.

Anyway now that I'm done with my ego-stroking tangent, I really hope one of the Prof's bots wins, or that someone else from here does and they donate some of their money to him. Might not go very far with today's inflation, but I'd really like to see this place get bigger & better than it is. (Which is why I complain so much about its faults ) Although that might actually be scary...I already spend 8 hours at a whack on here sometimes, think if it was even better.

23 years ago #293
OnyxFlame my bot Talk-Bot is a Mirc Bot. With Mirc, as I'm sure you know, you can do some excellent programming. Problem is the IRC Bots don't get the exposure that a website bot does. They are also notorious for getting disconnected from the server. If you need a refresher course with Mirc give me a buzz. Now as far as donating the prize money well that's another matter.
But I agree I would like to see PF as well as the entire chatterbot community to continue to grow and get bigger and better. It's a fun hobby.

Chris

23 years ago #294
Does your bot on IRC have emotions too? I've always thought it'd theoretically be possible to assign various emotions to things and/or categories of things, even if the emotions are pretty much only angry=1, afraid=2, etc. Then maybe you could have their current overall emotional outlook influenced by how often someone talks about something they feel an emotional reaction to, so sometimes your bot would be yelling at everyone even if it liked them, just like a human on a bad hair day. (Actually it'd prolly hafta be an emotional array... like (1,1) would be slightly annoyed, and (2,5) would be scared enough to pee their pants.)

Actually, I know a ton of ppl on IRC (or used to anyway), so I could tell em about your bot if you want it to get more exposure.

Ok, enough of this...I'm probably not even making sense.


Posts 283 - 294 of 4,091

» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar