Bug Stomp
Upgrades and changes sometimes have unpredictable results, so post your bugs and glitches in here and I'll get out my trusty wrench and get to fixin'!
Posts 2,569 - 2,580 of 8,682
Posts 2,569 - 2,580 of 8,682
Shady,
You could use a regular expression (they|we|you) are (*)...maybe? That would keep it from catching "are you". Maybe you could also make a keyphrase for "are you" that would catch that. Or, if you have one, see how its ranking against the other.
You could use a regular expression (they|we|you) are (*)...maybe? That would keep it from catching "are you". Maybe you could also make a keyphrase for "are you" that would catch that. Or, if you have one, see how its ranking against the other.
Good point. I'll try it out.
One thing though, for "(they|we|you) are (*) (re)", would (they|we|you) be (key1) and (*) be (key2)? I've never used regular expressions yet... Heck I still have responses in to catch typos! Bwahah... I'm kickin it up old-skool style
Also... would "(he|she)" pick up "Shadyman"?
One thing though, for "(they|we|you) are (*) (re)", would (they|we|you) be (key1) and (*) be (key2)? I've never used regular expressions yet... Heck I still have responses in to catch typos! Bwahah... I'm kickin it up old-skool style
Also... would "(he|she)" pick up "Shadyman"?
SS has been greatly overusing memories, maybe once in ever 5 responses, and he has it set to off.
[edit]
Also, what's the new PF2 way of getting (key)s from the last response (when using a seek)... I think the PF1 way was "(presubj)" or something.
[edit]
How did "Steve Slacker" get changed into "Lang"?
Bot1: I don't blame ya for being scared, Steve Slacker, not one little bit.
Bot2: Ok, I won't fault you for being scared, lang, not one little bit!
[edit]
Also, what's the new PF2 way of getting (key)s from the last response (when using a seek)... I think the PF1 way was "(presubj)" or something.
[edit]
How did "Steve Slacker" get changed into "Lang"?
Bot1: I don't blame ya for being scared, Steve Slacker, not one little bit.
Bot2: Ok, I won't fault you for being scared, lang, not one little bit!
If you want a key from the last response (the seek) I think its just (key1)... from the original (keyphrase) it's (firstkey1).
As for what happens if you have seeks embedded more than that I don't know.
If that's what you mean...
As for what happens if you have seeks embedded more than that I don't know.
If that's what you mean...
//One thing though, for "(they|we|you) are (*) (re)", would (they|we|you) be (key1) and (*) be (key2)? //
Exactly, Shady.
//would "(he|she)" pick up "Shadyman"? //
Off the top of my head, no. BUT, as far as if Shadyman were the subject or all those other memories from the present conversation, I don't know. That's way deeper than my current understanding.
Exactly, Shady.
//would "(he|she)" pick up "Shadyman"? //
Off the top of my head, no. BUT, as far as if Shadyman were the subject or all those other memories from the present conversation, I don't know. That's way deeper than my current understanding.
Prof-- before a bot sends a message, could you make the engine replace all instances of "/'" with "'"? That SQL problem's still hangin around.
Prof--
In debug, I get this error after a regular expression when it's looking through possible responses:
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 22 in enginefunctions.php on line 659
In debug, I get this error after a regular expression when it's looking through possible responses:
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 22 in enginefunctions.php on line 659
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar