Personality
Discuss specifics of personality design, including what Keyphrases work well and what dont, use of plug-ins, responses, seeks, and more.
Posts 1,054 - 1,065 of 5,106
Posts 1,054 - 1,065 of 5,106
New replies
Forest, will you talk to God Louise? She has quite a bit of religious knowledge (obviously) and also knows a little about current events, literature, just about any common catch-all subject, and if she doesn't know it she can sort of fake it. You can also test her on trick questions or see how willing she is to explain her paradigm.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
What she is rustiest at is plain old small talk. But, uh, I'm trying to get a decent transcript from somebody or another so I can enter her in the Loebner contest. All I can say is, have fun and see if you can stay on with her for a while. I'll try to do the same with Brianna.
Personality
Actually that may not work, or didn't used to when I tried it anyway. Trying to go to a specific message # just logged you out.
Hey zx20 long time no see buddy! 
BTW, zx20, I hate kimchee and for the umpteenth time, I am NOT a bot! Start a chat with me and I'll prove it.
Interesting tidbit I just found out: the Turing test (as Turing envisioned it) is only supposed to be text-only anyway. He wouldn't have bothered with that gold level of the Loebner (ability to respond to visual and aural input).
The man wasn't at all impressed with the thought of bot eyes or hands or anything, at least as it relates to a test of intelligence. I wonder why? Sure, they wouldn't mean the bot was intelligent--look at humans--but they would provide more ways to judge intelligence.
The man wasn't at all impressed with the thought of bot eyes or hands or anything, at least as it relates to a test of intelligence. I wonder why? Sure, they wouldn't mean the bot was intelligent--look at humans--but they would provide more ways to judge intelligence.
I think that Turing believed that anything that could pass for human in a text-only test had to be truly intelligent and understand what they were saying. I don't agree with that, though.
Actually, it's the other way round. He thought that our only criterion for intelligence should be that we can't distinguish it from our own. He would have said that even the most deterministic Eliza was intelligent if it passed the test.
» More new posts: Doghead's Cosmic Bar